zimcricketforums.com

the wicket in CTG should assist spinners more. which means price, utseya and cremer may get some wickets. but it also means ZIM are virtually guaranteed to score under 200. personally, as this is the last game for us before WC, i want to see ZIM bundled under 50 and a 9 wicket win if we bowl first....

the wicket in CTG should assist spinners more. which means price, utseya and cremer may get some wickets. but it also means ZIM are virtually guaranteed to score under 200.

personally, as this is the last game for us before WC, i want to see ZIM bundled under 50 and a 9 wicket win if we bowl first.

thanks Syed bhai

Why are we showing these Bangladeshi spinners so much respect? Yes they are good, but they are hardly Shane Warne or Murali. as far as Razzak goes, he's going at just 2.89 runs per over this series...so its not as if he's gotten his wickets from batsman trying to belt him to all corners. its true a...

excellent shot at beating NZ and reaching the QF stage. you guys have got to play ur 3 spinners in price, utseya, and cremer...and choke the Kiwis to death. batting-wise u just have to see off vettori and possibly hamish bennet as well.

it seems zimbabwe are having some of the same problems we are/were having vis a vis Ashraful and his continued BS batting. granted i'd still give him the lower order sloggers role since we lack firepower down the order. but here's my (BD viewpoint) take on the first 2 games of the series: Bangladesh...

Mpofu is a muhc better bowler than the likes of Rainsford and some others.

that was razzak who took the hatty...shakib finished with 4.

razzak has taken probably 40 wickets against ZIM at an average of what must be getting close to 15 now.

chibhabha neither got behind nor on top of that cut shot...

Meth is quite ripped and about as tall as streak..how does he only bowl 70 mph???