Reasons why Graeme Cremer is better than Shane Warne

[brmtaylor.com admin]

• In their respective Test debuts, Warne had the disappointing match figures of 1/150 while Cremer's was 2/86
• After 6 Test matches, Warne's strike rate (bowling) was 89.7. Cremer's is much lower at 66.9.
• After 6 Test matches, Warne's bowling average was 47.61! Cremer's is lower again, at 45.76
• Neither Warne or Cremer have a Test century to their name, but Cremer's highest First Class score of 171* far exceeds Warne's 107*.
• In 311 one day matches Warne has only scored one half century, while Cremer has secured two in just 74 matches.
• In ODI's, Warne's strike rate is 36.3 while Cremer's is just 33.7.
• Also in ODI's, after 194 matches Warne's best bowling performance was 5/33. After just 32 matches, Cremer has already secured a five-wicket haul - his 6/46 besting Warne's best bowling performance.

If you have more reasons why Cremer is better than Warne, please post them!

[ZIMDOGGY]

Because Tony Greig says Cremer is as sexy as antonio Banderas.

Tony Greig didnt say that about Warne.

[bayhaus]

Imagine if Cremer played matches as consistently as Warne did! Cremer you go boy!