Hick

[Zimfanatic69]

He went through a stage where he was one of England's most consistent batters

which is not saying much as england were consistently shit at the time.

Chill ! They were far from "shit", at the time thye were probably playing better cricket than the Aussies, the Indians and the South Africans.

england were poor in the early and mid nineties. they never played better cricket consistently than the aussies or south africans during that time. perhaps you should have watched the games.

[brmtaylor.com admin]

Chill ! They were far from "s***", at the time thye were probably playing better cricket than the Aussies, the Indians and the South Africans.

Surely we are not talking about the same England team that didn't win an Ashes series in 16 years I have to agree with Zimfanatic, England weren't a good team in the 90's.

[sloandog]

In the mid nineties England were better than India and South Africa. They won against South Africa in 1994 at home and then away in 1995/96 away, and then in 1998 they drew the series. Okay maybe they wern't as good as the Aussies, but lets face it.....who was ?? And England were head and shoulders above the Indians

[sloandog]

Chill ! They were far from "s***", at the time thye were probably playing better cricket than the Aussies, the Indians and the South Africans.

Surely we are not talking about the same England team that didn't win an Ashes series in 16 years I have to agree with Zimfanatic, England weren't a good team in the 90's.

Good to here from you BRM

[Zimfanatic69]

Chill ! They were far from "s***", at the time thye were probably playing better cricket than the Aussies, the Indians and the South Africans.

Surely we are not talking about the same England team that didn't win an Ashes series in 16 years I have to agree with Zimfanatic, England weren't a good team in the 90's.

yeah, that's the same england

england were consistently poor and flattered to deceive. they were not better than sout africa and certainly not india or pakistan. england were on a par with new zealand and the windies.

the same england who were caught out in the world cup in 1996 and declined in one day cricket for nearly 15 years. they have started to come good in the last couple of years.

[brmtaylor.com admin]

Good to here from you BRM

Thanks sloandog, I'm already looking forward to Zimbabwe's next ODI series. Australia's current form is certainly nothing to get excited about

[sloandog]

they were not better than sout africa

Mate, maybe you mis understood me. England beat South Africa 2 times in 3 tours and drew the other one

[sloandog]

Good to here from you BRM

Thanks sloandog, I'm already looking forward to Zimbabwe's next ODI series. Australia's current form is certainly nothing to get excited about

Tell me about it mate, but Australia have the grit to succeed, they should beat the Pakistan

[Zimfanatic69]

they were not better than sout africa

Mate, maybe you mis understood me. England beat South Africa 2 times in 3 tours and drew the other one

well duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

mate, you misunderstood me. i was talking about the decade as a whole not a couple of series. i contend over that time period south africa were a better test nation than england.

now do you get it.

[sloandog]

they were not better than sout africa

Mate, maybe you mis understood me. England beat South Africa 2 times in 3 tours and drew the other one

well duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

mate, you misunderstood me. i was talking about the decade as a whole not a couple of series. i contend over that time period south africa were a better test nation than england.

now do you get it.

I get the fact that you're wrong, and I also get the fact that your being a smart arse