Fair call. We've had our bad ones in this match too, and we have another innings to surviveforeignfield wrote:This match is turning into an advert for DRS for sure. But no favours to either side.

Fair call. We've had our bad ones in this match too, and we have another innings to surviveforeignfield wrote:This match is turning into an advert for DRS for sure. But no favours to either side.
There is no need for any context. Its a context-less statement. You can't compare a tough poor decision of a #10 batsman with a howler of an opener. Lets be honest, how many runs would have Chakabva and/or Shingi make? The big break was Chigs on 73 who was plumb as could be. That MORE than makes up for Chakabva.betterdays wrote:In the context of the game and series you are right .. Shingis 'out' was far more important. He added a great partnership last test, was looking ok and his contribution could have turned the game...Kriterion_BD wrote:Can't compare a Shingi to a Tamim or an Ashraful.
that's the question i was hoping you would ask yourself....his contribution in the last test was (?) in a partnership of (?) [this is why context is everything]. My guess is the 'more' he would have added would have been more telling than whatever the BD top 4 would add...Kriterion_BD wrote:[Lets be honest, how many runs would have Chakabva and/or Shingi make? The big break was Chigs on 73 who was plumb as could be. That MORE than makes up for Chakabva.
Serously? Well if reality is such, then ball missing Tamim's bat by 4 inches is certainly a thick edge!betterdays wrote:that's the question i was hoping you would ask yourself....his contribution in the last test was (?) in a partnership of (?) [this is why context is everything]. My guess is the 'more' he would have added would have been more telling than whatever the BD top 4 would add...Kriterion_BD wrote:[Lets be honest, how many runs would have Chakabva and/or Shingi make? The big break was Chigs on 73 who was plumb as could be. That MORE than makes up for Chakabva.
what? no, it's a bad decision that probably doesn't influence the game in any way at all. Shingi's decision certainly did [influence the game] -especially if you consider what he could have contributed (by looking at what he contributed in the first test)!!Kriterion_BD wrote:Serously? Well if reality is such, then ball missing Tamim's bat by 4 inches is certainly a thick edge!betterdays wrote:that's the question i was hoping you would ask yourself....his contribution in the last test was (?) in a partnership of (?) [this is why context is everything]. My guess is the 'more' he would have added would have been more telling than whatever the BD top 4 would add...Kriterion_BD wrote:[Lets be honest, how many runs would have Chakabva and/or Shingi make? The big break was Chigs on 73 who was plumb as could be. That MORE than makes up for Chakabva.