[Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Participate in discussion with your fellow Zimbabwe cricket fans!
User avatar
Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic)
Posts: 2431
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:14 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: India
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic) »

Chappie, chappie, chappie
Zim Rules
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Satendra Singh, Delhi, India
Twitter: @drsitu

sloandog
Posts: 10386
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:28 am
Supports: MidWest Rhinos
Location: Manchester UK

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by sloandog »

106 to win !! In 11 overs
Good luck boys am off to watch :)

User avatar
Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic)
Posts: 2431
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:14 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: India
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic) »

Was it cricketing spirit or self-destruction?
Zim Rules
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Satendra Singh, Delhi, India
Twitter: @drsitu

User avatar
brmtaylor.com admin
Administrator
Posts: 7940
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by brmtaylor.com admin »

Well, the rain is back and play is stopped bang on the 5th over - so that leaves Sri Lanka ahead on Duckworth Lewis and with the likely win. Very unfortunate, it was bad luck for Zimbabwe but in these rain affected / reduced overs matches it is always going to be unfair on someone.

Zimbabwe will need to hammer New Zealand to make it through now.

Mike
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:51 pm

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by Mike »

Why didn't we time waste?

Yes its against the rules and nature of the game, but I know that most teams would of done this. :? :cry: :|

At least we have gained a lot of experiance which we can build on which is a major plus and like I said, we bowled well. We restricted some very good batsmen (a part from Jayawardene :mrgreen: :roll: )

User avatar
Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic)
Posts: 2431
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:14 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: India
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic) »

Rain started 3 balls before the deadline of 5 overs to constitute a match. Zim were way behind thanks to some poor cricketing decision of not sending hitters at no.3. Even then, the guys had the chance to slow down a things bit so that match stopped at 4.5 overs (which was possible). Cricketing spirit wise guys did well but there was a chance to grab for the progression into next round. That was blown. Was it right or wrong is debatable but i couldnt find any logic in staying back Eltie/Choppie/Erwine.

A world stage to perform is a rare entity for us. We shocked Aussies in first WC, was denied visas for the second, and did initially well in this edition (warm-ups sadly hardly matters). We again faltered. 44 after 5 overs should have been our first priority taking into consideration the conditions.
Zim Rules
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Satendra Singh, Delhi, India
Twitter: @drsitu

User avatar
Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic)
Posts: 2431
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:14 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: India
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic) »

Mike wrote:Why didn't we time waste?

Yes its against the rules and nature of the game, but I know that most teams would of done this. :? :cry: :|

At least we have gained a lot of experiance which we can build on which is a major plus and like I said, we bowled well. We restricted some very good batsmen (a part from Jayawardene :mrgreen: :roll: )
When we are denied to play in top events and when silly countries like NZ, Aussies didnot fulfill their commitments then we have full right to use other tactics. Nobody cares if we bowled well or not, what matters is SL=2, ZIM=0 and a poor NRR.
Zim Rules
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Satendra Singh, Delhi, India
Twitter: @drsitu

User avatar
Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic)
Posts: 2431
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:14 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: India
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic) »

cricinfo: 12:59pm Sri Lanka have won the game by 14 runs, by the Duckworth/Lewis method. So that's the end of this game, and Zimbabwe should be kicking themselves for not going harder in the five overs of play that was possible. The par score was 43, as Shaun Pollock would tell you, you need to be one above that for a win. Zim finished at 29, leaving them 14 short of the par score.

NRR

sRI Lanka +0.355
New Zealand +0.258
Zimbabwe -2.800

A mountain to climb and perhaps the tournament is over. I am so sad.
Zim Rules
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Satendra Singh, Delhi, India
Twitter: @drsitu

User avatar
brmtaylor.com admin
Administrator
Posts: 7940
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by brmtaylor.com admin »

It's easy to look back and say we should have done this or that, but when you are talking about reduced overs matches it's never going to be fair.

Had we sent Chigumbura out at number three and lost quick wickets, that D/L target of 44 could have skyrocketed. Had we tried to waste time at the 4.5 over mark, the umpires might have played the final ball anyway (as they weren't impressed with the openers taking so long to walk out at the start of the innings). Who knows?

All the team brainstrust can do is look to tomorrow's match against New Zealand and work out the NRR we need to progress to the next stage, and hope the players play out of their skins to achieve that result.

I think it's unfair what happened tonight, but I also accept that it's a fact of cricket. Strictly from a playing perspective, Zimbabwe did not disgrace themselves tonight.

User avatar
Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic)
Posts: 2431
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:14 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: India
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe (Group B 2nd Match)

Post by Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic) »

It's understandable that those who were in middle were in the thick of the things but after the fall of 1st wkt, Mr Butcher should have sent the right person. In 1st T20 we were knocked out coz of NRR. Tomorow i am sure we will be able to beat NZ but i am worried about the NRR thing. Its MINUS 2 and today we couldnot achieve 6+ RR.
Zim Rules
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Satendra Singh, Delhi, India
Twitter: @drsitu

Post Reply