Spirit of the game is not to be seen as an ultimate judge which undermines the dynamics of a match.sam_ahm wrote: ↑Tue Nov 07, 2023 10:48 amIf a batsman gets an inside edge, has no reviews left, and is given out, then after seeing on big screen I'm expecting fielding team captain to withdraw appeal and bring back the batter.
Spirit of game right, you have seen with your eyes that batsman had an inside edge, how can you not call him back?
You can't pick and choose when you want to show spirit of cricket. Do it all the time if you advocate for it.
A match consists also of human errors made by umpires or opposition appealing for something that video check would prove wrong.
In your example we may have a good (or bad) faith appeal, then there has been the decision of the umpire.
I agree that teams be granted only a limited number of reviews. After that there is the human error of the umpire.
The alternative would be a relentless review of every possible lbw, edges, etc. It would turn out in afternoons spent mostly on watching slo-motions rather than playing a game.
So, my opinion is that I prefer a game with likely errors made by both the umpires and the captain who appeals.
If a human error component is accepted, no breach of the spirit of the game is applicable.