Thanks to all for the kind words. I am not unbiased, though, lol. I still believe we are the "better team", although I will 200% concede that the better team during the last 4 days won by 335 runs, and that sure as hell wasn't us.Jemisi wrote:
Thanks for being around. It is brave when things are this rough. You add lots to the forum with your perspectives.
Honestly, though I think both ZIM and BD suffer from mental lapses. For ZIM there could be a myriad reasons why they don't have their heads in the game when they play, but I think they fail to do what they did against us. Bangladesh doesn't handle pressure well at all. Its not a new thing either. Against other teams, there is no pressure and we've done "well". When there is pressure we've played like minnows (last over of the Asia Cup final, 4th innings vs WI last year) to name a few examples. Against ZIM the pressure of winning creates a lack of clarity of thought.
ZIM's seam attack is clearly better than ours. We don't have to discuss names here. Our spin attack is stronger, and I would say our batsman are stronger as well. Apart from Taylor, the rest of the ZIM batters didn't do much better than ours. The difference was in Taylor + the seam attack's superiority.
I also think that our teams are heavily reliant on conditions. Then again so are the top sides...India lost 4-0 in Australia, and Australia lost 4-0 in India. Does this mean either or both are crap sides? So too, BD sucks in ZIM conditions, and ZIM (based on ODI records) would likely suck in BD.
Ultimately this means that not a whole lot seperates the two sides. Which speaks volumes for you, since your population, player base, economy, and administration are all significantly smaller than ours.