Re: [Match Thread] West Indies v Zimbabwe (4th ODI)
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:36 pm
Maruma, creamer, taibu, taylor, masakadza, price have impessed me .I think they r for the future.
The Home of Zimbabwean Cricket Fans
https://www.zimcricketforums.com/
That now makes the two of us mate...The Saint wrote:Why is Taylor immune to criticism on this forum? Why is he never a candidate to be dropped? Everyone praises him yet he's efforts agaisnt Bangladesh, S.Afr and the W.I have been poor to say the least (Yes he made a century against Banladesh only when the series was over). In time he might be a player but to me he still has a long way to go. And once again why does Mutizwa's name hardly ever come up as a possible replacement?
Sorry i forgot to mention the main man Mr Chigumbura. He is the star on the rise for zim.muyendesi wrote:Maruma, creamer, taibu, taylor, masakadza, price have impessed me .I think they r for the future.
I could have been the 3rd one here guys but having watched all the games so for .The boys looks like he has the best technique in the team but on merit he shld join the other floops to be dropped the next time we play.Conant wrote:That now makes the two of us mate...The Saint wrote:Why is Taylor immune to criticism on this forum? Why is he never a candidate to be dropped? Everyone praises him yet he's efforts agaisnt Bangladesh, S.Afr and the W.I have been poor to say the least (Yes he made a century against Banladesh only when the series was over). In time he might be a player but to me he still has a long way to go. And once again why does Mutizwa's name hardly ever come up as a possible replacement?
In the context of this series: he's not there. I think he's one to keep an eye on, though. Although as Vusi is showing us, good domestic form doesn't automatically equal good international form.The Saint wrote:And once again why does Mutizwa's name hardly ever come up as a possible replacement?
I agree with maehara here .Most of these players r in the this team cause of good domestic form and most of them have proved to us that domestic form does not mean good international form .Lamb , sibanda, matsikenyere, mpofu, masakadza and other haved this to be correct. Having said that I like lamb as a spin bowler.maehara wrote:In the context of this series: he's not there. I think he's one to keep an eye on, though. Although as Vusi is showing us, good domestic form doesn't automatically equal good international form.The Saint wrote:And once again why does Mutizwa's name hardly ever come up as a possible replacement?
Sean Williams also has class (in fact, probably classier) but still got dropped. There are quite a few more of those classy players as well, Zimfan; Vusi, Chibhabha and they are hopeless when it comes to team contribution, as Taylor has been so farzimfan1 wrote:Look at his stats, he has the highest average in the team and has scored the most half centuries, yes i accept he is not in his best form at the moment but the class it there.The Saint wrote:Why is Taylor immune to criticism on this forum? Why is he never a candidate to be dropped? Everyone praises him yet he's efforts agaisnt Bangladesh, S.Afr and the W.I have been poor to say the least (Yes he made a century against Banladesh only when the series was over). In time he might be a player but to me he still has a long way to go. And once again why does Mutizwa's name hardly ever come up as a possible replacement?
Mutizwa has a very iffy technique which will be badly exposed against quick international class bowling.