Flakeman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 30, 2017 4:03 pm
Haha you call Phelukwayo quality? He hardly ever got a game for the u19s under Jennings, what does that say about quotas getting a free ride? Markram, Bosch, Van Der Merwe were far better u19s than him. But away they went because they live in a racist system. Andile isn't international standard, anyone who has a brain can see that watching him play.
He has a call up to the Test squad with absolute shocker record at first class. If they wanna argue for Age then why not put the even younger Wiaan Mulder who has twice the first class stats of Andile. He isn't even in the A team. Don't get me started about Dwaine Pretorius either. His stats are sublime.
Complete racism, it sickens me
You're extremely confused. Which is sad and tragic. Are you not satisfied with what Phehlukwayo
came and did to Zimbabwe?
You should try and find out why guys like Wiese and Pretorius have good stats, as well as why they seem to flop in internationals.
Guys like Kuhn, van Wyk and Vilas flopped against ZImbabwe itself - the A/XI side. Not so with Ramela and Phehlukwayo.
There is a reason why guys like Bavuma, Phehlukwayo, Rabada, Reeza Hendricks etc excel for the national team regardless of their FC stats, while guys like Ingram, Hardus Viljoen, Jon Jon Smuts, Stiaan van Zyl etc flop.
Makhaya Ntini's 16 year old son is already streets ahead of any of the ZIM/WI/SA 19 year old on display during WI's recent tour to Southern Africa.
If you must know - which you do, SA's cricket system has got two divisions which are classified as FC. However, most of the excellent young African players go straight form High school to franchise cricket. Only the average ones play in the 2nd division, which is where guys like Wiese and Pretorius plunder 3rd rate players to amass lovely-looking stats. When Vilas failed to dislodge Tsolekile from the Lions on merit, he went to that league and bolstered his stats then eventually moved to another franchise. That got him into the Proteas.
But what is Vilas' record -
http://www.espncricinfo.com/southafrica ... 62456.html.
Selected at 31 years old, on the back of 10 years of FC cricket, but could on manage an average of 10 after 6 Tests!
NEVER look at a South African cricket and focus on their FC stats. Focus on their FRANCHISE STATS. That's what CSA has been doing and it's been forced to admit that they've been duped for many years. Never mind Rabada, it's common knowledge that Duanne Olivier and Viljoen have nothing on Ngidi, yet have a 9 year "experience advantage".
Fact remains almost all so-called "quota" picks for the Proteas end up number 1, or at worst top 5 in one format or another. That's unbelievable if you think about it. Even Bavuma got an ODI 100 on debut - OPENING! Plus Man of the match.
A youngster picked straight into Franchise cricket will have poor stats compared to a player picked and plays 5 seasons bossing a virtual club league.
Roelof van der Merwe?
Not good enough, but I'd pick him for his attitude - fearless and aggressive in his play. Same with Robbie Frylinck. FYI, Aiden Markram was picked to play Franchise cricket, but flopped badly and was dropped. Call Titans and Northens and ask them. He did well last season only. But so did Haseeb Hameed when he was picked for England. I like Mulder. He was thrown to the deepend first up. That's why he has "quota" looking stats. But Mulder is well below Andile's talent, an dmore like an Ayabulela Gqamane-lite.
Forget South Africa. Stick to ZImbabwe and focus on Innocent Kaia, Luke Jongwe and Wellington Masakadza. I'm successfully doing my bit here. Do your bit there, instead of ignoring class and talent that wastes away.