You have probably had more contradictions in your time than any other forumite. Don't make me start digging through all your old posts!pariah wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2017 9:46 amThis thread is lovely for three reasons:
1. The attempts to defend the indefensible
2. Avoiding the elephant(s) in the room
3. The litany of contradictions that will abound as a result
I would love a ZImbabwean T20 tomorrow because of people think Tests is what pokes holes in this, T20s actually make it more glaring. Lots of round pegs in square holes...
8+3 combination is not ideal for winning test match
Re: 8+3 combination is not ideal for winning test match
Neil Johnson, Alistair Campbell, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), Grant Flower, Dave Houghton, Guy Whittall, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Ray Price, Eddo Brandes
Re: 8+3 combination is not ideal for winning test match
behave eugene, we've had a new US President who wonjust to prove a point, 3 British Prime MInisters (countless referendums), found Osama, and Liverpool almost won the Premiership, and the Proteas finally won a knockout match!
Re: 8+3 combination is not ideal for winning test match
Great to have you back, pariah.
Neil Johnson, Alistair Campbell, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), Grant Flower, Dave Houghton, Guy Whittall, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Ray Price, Eddo Brandes
- maehara
- Administrator
- Posts: 3986
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:27 pm
- Supports: Mashonaland Eagles
- Location: Ireland
- Contact:
Re: 8+3 combination is not ideal for winning test match
Think I need to implement a /sarcasm tag.