Nope. My point still stands.
Who in that top 3 should really be batting ahead of him? Even your answer will qualify that my point still stands.
Nope. My point still stands.
4 is not equal to 5/6. So, factually wrong.pariah wrote: ↑Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:54 pmNope. My point still stands.
Who in that top 3 should really be batting ahead of him? Even your answer will qualify that my point still stands.
Neil Mckenzie and Jacques Rudolph batting lower than Rilee Rossouw and Stiaan van Zyl makes sense. In India's case, there were times where I felt Manoj Tiwary would have done better if he backed himself up the order some more, and wouldn't have appreciated some of the older discarded/unsuitable Indian batsmen batting higher than him in domestic cricket.CrimsonAvenger wrote: ↑Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:06 pmAlso, by your own definition of more experienced players coming up higher in the order, Chapungu and Masvaure have many more FC matches than Moor and they should lead by example, followed by Gupo and Moor. So, 4 is not all that bad.
So have Utseya, Mutumbami, Timecyn Maruma etc. Difference is, in FC and List A, Moor was an opener just like Chari. You of all people know that intimately. It' slike someone ignoring Brendan Taylor was a regular u19, FC and List A opener for several years ... oops.Plus, Moor has always put his hand up even in the national setup to try different positions for the sake of team balance, so your point is moot.
Are you referring to Rhinos? Or saying Raza, Williams and Craig wrong but Moor not due to Rhinos? In that case, what of Malcom and Taylor?Take on the Tuskers middle order all your life, but Moor is not at fault.
Check the threads. viewtopic.php?f=3&t=14154&start=10How about Chigs opening for Eagles and Vusi for Mountaineers at the same rate?
Good to have that clarified. I wonder why you were only taking on Moor, Ervine and Williams yesterday and not Vusi and Elton till this was pointed out.