[Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Participate in discussion with your fellow Zimbabwe cricket fans!
Jayb
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:44 am

Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Post by Jayb »

That was fucking out. When you super slow mo down a catch it looks like it bounce but it was clearly out, his fingers were underneath it.

Bullshit.

User avatar
brmtaylor.com admin
Administrator
Posts: 7924
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Post by brmtaylor.com admin »

Jayb wrote:
Sun Oct 21, 2018 10:51 am
That was fucking out. When you super slow mo down a catch it looks like it bounce but it was clearly out, his fingers were underneath it.

Bullshit.
Yeah it looked out.

Umpires are doing their best to help BD here... they said Jarvis can only bowl 9 overs max because the aborted run-up earlier constitutes an over? WHAT? :shock:

Conant
Posts: 1520
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: Benoni, South Africa
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Post by Conant »

brmtaylor.com admin wrote:
Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:48 am
That looked pretty obviously out to me...

Soft signal was out, there was nothing I could see to overturn it... :x
Don't even know what Raza was trying, referring that one. These religious types can be quite a problem. :o :roll:

User avatar
brmtaylor.com admin
Administrator
Posts: 7924
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Post by brmtaylor.com admin »

Taylor and Ervine need to take about 3 steps forward - the ball is not carrying with our trundlers sending down 120 kmph fireballs :roll:

And give Mavuta an over or two against this tailender, given the Jarvis restriction we need to find a few more overs still from the spinners. Williams probably worth an over or two as well.
Conant wrote:
Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:04 am
brmtaylor.com admin wrote:
Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:48 am
That looked pretty obviously out to me...

Soft signal was out, there was nothing I could see to overturn it... :x
Don't even know what Raza was trying, referring that one. These religious types can be quite a problem. :o :roll:
Yeah, Ervine learnt from that mistake and celebrated like we'd won the World Cup :lol:
We can't win either way!

User avatar
kudet
Posts: 342
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:05 am
Supports: MidWest Rhinos
Location: Harare, Zimbabwe

Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Post by kudet »

hey guys balance me real quick here.. how is it that jarvis is said to be allowed to bowl 9 overs only.. rainsford was saying that the fact that he had attempted to make a run up to the delivery point constitutes an over??

User avatar
brmtaylor.com admin
Administrator
Posts: 7924
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Post by brmtaylor.com admin »

kudet wrote:
Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:35 am
hey guys balance me real quick here.. how is it that jarvis is said to be allowed to bowl 9 overs only.. rainsford was saying that the fact that he had attempted to make a run up to the delivery point constitutes an over??
I don't understand either - seems like a rule made up on the spot.

Dumb captaincy then... why not bring the field in to stop that single?


zimbot
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:35 am

Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Post by zimbot »

Bangers running away with it now. Kayes raping Chatara

zimbot
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:35 am

Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Post by zimbot »

I think it would've been better to bowl Jarvis out during those middle overs when he picked up those wickets.

He looks useless at the death.

Well they are all useless at the death tbf

User avatar
brmtaylor.com admin
Administrator
Posts: 7924
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI

Post by brmtaylor.com admin »

The last 10 overs have been disgraceful. 280 is on the cards now.
zimbot wrote:
Sun Oct 21, 2018 12:00 pm
I think it would've been better to bowl Jarvis out during those middle overs when he picked up those wickets.

He looks useless at the death.

Well they are all useless at the death tbf
I agree. May as well have bowled him out while he was still economical. No matter who we put on in the last 5 will go at 10+ an over.

Post Reply