The only thing that can be said in Chari's defence is that he scores centuries at domestic level occasionally. He has 8 which is a lot compared to his peers. He does make a hell of a lot of failures in between though.
In answer to the blue chip question - Chari.
Which continued selection is worse? Chari or Chigumbura?
Re: Which continued selection is worse? Chari or Chigumbura?
If he is good enough to score 8 why does he fail so much in between? I Dont understand thisJemisi wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:49 pmThe only thing that can be said in Chari's defence is that he scores centuries at domestic level occasionally. He has 8 which is a lot compared to his peers. He does make a hell of a lot of failures in between though.
In answer to the blue chip question - Chari.
Cricinfo profile of the 'James Bond' of cricket:
FULL NAME: Angus James Mackay
BORN: 13 June 1967, Harare
KNOWN AS: Gus Mackay
'The' Gus Mackay.
Hero.
Sportsman.
Artist.
Player.
**
Q. VUSI SIBANDA, WHERE DO YOU HOP?
A. UNDA DA ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE*
FULL NAME: Angus James Mackay
BORN: 13 June 1967, Harare
KNOWN AS: Gus Mackay
'The' Gus Mackay.
Hero.
Sportsman.
Artist.
Player.
**
Q. VUSI SIBANDA, WHERE DO YOU HOP?
A. UNDA DA ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE*
Re: Which continued selection is worse? Chari or Chigumbura?
Is it just that he is a terribly nervous starter? Is it that he can only score on the flattest of tracks?
