Page 2 of 2
Re: [Match Thread] Zim v IRL: T20I 2
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2019 9:47 pm
by Mueddie28
Googly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 12, 2019 5:09 pm
Ervine is our opener without question.
BT , Moor And Burl ..2 of the 3 should open
Ervine at 3rd is the best
Sean Williams at 4th
Re: [Match Thread] Zim v IRL: T20I 2
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:01 am
by Mueddie28
Mueddie28 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 12, 2019 9:47 pm
Googly wrote: ↑Fri Jul 12, 2019 5:09 pm
Ervine is our opener without question.
BT , Moor And Burl ..2 of the 3 should open
Ervine at 3rd is the best
Sean Williams at 4th
The captain should sit this one out....I hope the new board would appoint new selectors and drop Hami from captaincy...
Re: [Match Thread] Zim v IRL: T20I 2
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:01 am
by zimbos_05
I think the response to this thread shows says it all.
Can't believe people still think Hamilton is good enough.
Re: [Match Thread] Zim v IRL: T20I 2
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2019 8:41 am
by Kriterion_BD
zimbos_05 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:01 am
Can't believe people still think Hamilton is good enough.
Depends on what "good enough" means. Good enough to consistently win games agains top sides? Not even Taylor is of that class given his overseas record and record in clutch situations. Good enough to compete against teams ranked around 10-12? Yes Masakadza was once good enough for that. He might still come back with some attractive scores vs excellent bowling lineups of Afghanistan and Bangladesh in a couple of months. But my assessment has always been that Masakadza was never good enough to lead Zimbabwe from the front for any considerable period of time.
Re: [Match Thread] Zim v IRL: T20I 2
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2019 9:48 am
by Jemisi
Everyone was bagging Ervine five minutes ago. He has had a good winter. Our guys are always up and down
Re: [Match Thread] Zim v IRL: T20I 2
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 10:52 am
by robbocricket
I would like to reply to this post but I am not allowed to because I have not posted 10 posts - so this is another