Page 1 of 2
Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boycott
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:46 am
by maehara
Things may not be as rosy as observers may have cause to hope for, but respect for those seeking to rebuild the country and its cricket must surpass anger about those hell-bent on its destruction
Full article - it's a long one.
Not that there ever
was a formal boycott outside than the problems with England and New Zealand.
Re: Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boyco
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:19 pm
by bayhaus
Everything could disintegrate once the World Cup is finished.
I think this is ill informed and I believe the progress in Zim cricket has nothing to do with the WC (Especially the Soccer?

)
Re: Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boyco
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:03 pm
by maehara
bayhaus wrote:Everything could disintegrate once the World Cup is finished.
I think this is ill informed and I believe the progress in Zim cricket has nothing to do with the WC (Especially the Soccer?

)
His belief, I believe, is that Mugabe / ZanuPF are only playing ball with Zuma's mediation efforts as there is / was a potential spin-off benefit for Zimbabwe if the World Cup went ahead in South Africa - at least
some of those tourists would come Zim's way an spend money. If that's all that ZanuPF were going into the GNU for, then it'll all fall apart once the World Cup's over and the tourist boom's gone.
Like you, I don't agree.
Re: Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boyco
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:09 am
by ZIMDOGGY
maybe i misread but did Roebuck say that the purging of white cricketers was a good thing????
Re: Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boyco
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:44 am
by maehara
ZIMDOGGY wrote:maybe i misread but did Roebuck say that the purging of white cricketers was a good thing????
Yes, he did.
Never did like the way Roebuck thinks.
Re: Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boyco
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:48 am
by sloandog
maehara wrote:ZIMDOGGY wrote:maybe i misread but did Roebuck say that the purging of white cricketers was a good thing????
Yes, he did.
Never did like the way Roebuck thinks.
That's terrible
Re: Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boyco
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:52 pm
by ZIMDOGGY
sloandog wrote:maehara wrote:ZIMDOGGY wrote:maybe i misread but did Roebuck say that the purging of white cricketers was a good thing????
Yes, he did.
Never did like the way Roebuck thinks.
That's terrible
Not only is that extremely racist, it is a slap in the face to hardship and fear that the small minority white population have lived with in the 00's.
These are the founders and lifeblood of cricket in the country.
I know ALL zimbabweans have gone through extreme hardship in this time. However they didnt have to live with the fear of being specifically targeted for violent crime because of their race. VIOLENT racism, not the politically correct "ooh dont say that word because that could be racist if you think about it" kind of racism that i dont have time for ( speaking personally) found in the western world.
Its also a slap to us fans who had to watch the likes of Dabengwa and Matsikenyeri show their 'brilliance'..
Re: Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boyco
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:03 am
by Clifford Harris
I see there is no progress on this one gentlemen, look at it, we blame blacj people for throwing the race card everytime there are allegations of unfair treatment but here we are digging up the same hatchjet we buried more than a year ago. Return of white cricketers has nothing to do with progress in Zimbabwe, have you ever heard of the phrase "return of white supporters", because no one give a damn what colour you are...Roebuck is blunt and clear about his views towards Zimbabwe and South Africa he believes there is venom within the system and wants to believe he is the Robin Hood of cricket, under the mask of heroism and biased antimedia campaigns. Okay you want to act as the voice of the people then at least have the journalistic fibre to be in the countries that you report about, the world is tired of people who write match reports and analysis based from Cricinfo ball by ball commentry and AFP or AP stories which corolate to form a well structered Zimbabwean report, "from Zimbabwe", interviewing Zimbabwean's lol all written in Australia...bloddy hell!!!
Re: Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boyco
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:11 am
by ZIMDOGGY
i just dont understand why he wants to abolish the one thing that keeps the white community bonded and together.
cricket is a huge part of the european zimbabwean culture.
They arent hurting anyone. They are accepting of other zimbabweans watching the games too. It brings all races together when you look at it like that.
Why would anyone want to take awy something thats close to those peoples hearts?
Do you think that would help race relations in that country?
If Roebuck had his way it would make for some resentful people.
Re: Peter Roebuck: Case for reconsidering the Zimbabwe boyco
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:56 am
by Conant
Being a victim of class snobbery himself, Roebuck believed the principle of pushing black players through the system was right. Indeed, of the few things he lauded Zimbabwe Cricket for, this was one, and was quite damning of South Africa's ineffectual efforts to do the same.
Hhm mentioned this weak will in passing a few days ago I think
ZIMDOGGY wrote:They arent hurting anyone. They are accepting of other zimbabweans watching the games too. It brings all races together when you look at it like that.
Why would anyone want to take awy something thats close to those peoples hearts?
Like the Springboks,
zimdoggy?