Exactly. Solid FC player, not international standard. At the very best, perhaps a half decent T20 option.
Besides, he's only been in Zimbabwe due to COVID
Exactly. Solid FC player, not international standard. At the very best, perhaps a half decent T20 option.
the comparison is not well analyzed. Zim won most of the matches till 2003.of those against a bangladesh very new and weak side.secretzimbo wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 9:49 amZimbabwe: 115 Test matches, 13 wins.Rajkumar Sharma wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 9:15 amThis team doesnt have the bowling to take 20 wickets and batting to play each sessions in an innings against the top 1 to 8 ranked side.However, this team can compete in shorter format if the youngstars are groomed and made accustomed to match situations, this team is far behind from what is required to sustain in test cricket.
I see this team doing well in shorter format near future if ZC gives more interest to T20 & ODIS.
Bangladesh: 124 Test matches, 14 wins.
India: First 115 Test matches, 14 wins.
Surely not international product of top 12 cricketing nations.
I don't get what you're sayingfarhanhussan wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:45 amSurely not international product of top 12 cricketing nations.
But he was looking like far superior than local talent at display in Zim.
sloandog wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:56 amI mean to say he is not of international standards. But still he was looking better than most of the Zim domestic cricketers. He did so well in logan cup matches n one t 20 he got chance to play.farhanhussan wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 11:45 amSurely not international product of top 12 cricketing nations.
But he was looking like far superior than local talent at display in Zim.
When you don't have pace and swing what u can do bowling at good length.let the batters do play nice shoot. He seems hardworking n bowler with thinking behind his deliveries.
I don't get what you're saying
Bro, when India got test status, all were strong teams AUS, NZ, WI, ENG, RSA. There were only 5 teams played test cricket, and all were superior, India did'nt get opportunity to face weak teams or any team of their standard in tests as they didn't existed then, even Bangladesh & Pakistan were part of India then, whereas now the situation is differant Zimbabwe has the opportunity to beat teams which are quiet similar to them, they had Bangladesh & Sri Lanka in early 90s and now there is Afghans, Irish, even Bangladesh, Windies & Sri Lanka can be beatable, but Zim failed to establish as team.2003 & Mugabe's black empowerment policy proved to be attack of atomb bomb on Zimbabwe Cricket, which showed so much promise back in 90s. India played 15 years of cricket when they were under British rule, how could cricket have an impact then in a country which had no freedomsecretzimbo wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 9:49 amZimbabwe: 115 Test matches, 13 wins.Rajkumar Sharma wrote: ↑Mon May 10, 2021 9:15 amThis team doesnt have the bowling to take 20 wickets and batting to play each sessions in an innings against the top 1 to 8 ranked side.However, this team can compete in shorter format if the youngstars are groomed and made accustomed to match situations, this team is far behind from what is required to sustain in test cricket.
I see this team doing well in shorter format near future if ZC gives more interest to T20 & ODIS.
Bangladesh: 124 Test matches, 14 wins.
India: First 115 Test matches, 14 wins.