If we were to play a Test match tomorrow, name your first XI
Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:32 am
If we were to play a Test match tomorrow, what would your first eleven be? Let's suppose it was to be played at Harare Sports Club. To make it fair, only players from within the Logan Cup (or could not play the first 2 rounds due to injury) can be selected. And it doesn't have to be players who have been outstanding so far in the Logan Cup - it is the best eleven that you think could play in a Test for Zimbabwe.
1. Hamilton Masakadza 15 - Bat avg 27.06
2. Mark Vermeulen 8 - 25.87
3. Tatenda Taibu 24 - 29.60
4. Stuart Matsikenyeri 8 - 23.40
5. Prosper Utseya - 1 - 22.50
6. Elton Chigumbura 6 - 15.58 / Bowl avg 55.33
7. Forster Mutizwa - debut
8. Graeme Cremer - 6 - Bowl avg 45.76
9. Ray Price - 18 - Bowl avg 35.86
10. Tawanda Mupariwa 1 - Bowl avg undefined
11. Ed Rainsford - debut
I've intentionally left out someone like Malcolm Waller. While his Logan Cup form has been very good in the past few matches, he still doesn't have a First Class century to his name and only a handful of First Class matches.
I haven't gone for the most experienced lineup possible (otherwise you could have Hondo in place of Rainsford, Coventry in place of Mutizwa, etc) but the lineup that has the best mix of form and experience. Just because Nyamuzinga has made more runs than Vermeulen in this series doesn't mean that he would be better prepared for a Test match than Vermeulen.
There are 77 Test matches of experience in that team. Which isn't really that much, but at least there are 9 of 11 guys going into that team with some idea of what to expect. And Rainsford has enough ODI caps behind him to understand what international cricket involves. Mutizwa is the only one who is really fresh at international level, but current form suggests that he would do better than Sibanda, Coventry or Dabengwa.
So at the top of the order we have our best players, the three guys that have a Test hundred under their belt. To escape with a draw (probably anything less than an innings defeat would be considered progress, but hey, a draw has to be the aim) these three guys - Masakadza, Vermeulen and Taibu - need to make at least 50 each, with one of them going on to make a 80+. The most important thing for Zimbabwe is a good start - if we can get to 100 without loss then the worst is behind us (ie. the risk of being 6/40). If we can get to 130 for the loss of 1 then we are past the second danger point (the infamous 3/123 to 10/127 or whatever it was).
So say Masakadza is 60*, Vermeulen 60, we are 1/120. Taibu comes in and sees Masakadza through to a higher score - Masakadza departs on 85 with the score at 2/160 (Taibu 10*, a few extras).
Then we are into the middle order, which by comparison is quite weak for a variety of reasons. The first of which is the presence of Matsikenyeri - we know he is a flat track bully who only seems to get runs against the weakest opposition and when the pressure is off. But, he does have a bit of Test experience. And we know he is brilliant in the field. If he made 20 - 30, then you'd have to consider it a success. But you expect a sub-5 score, so let's say he makes 1.
Scorecard reads
Masakadza 85
Vermeulen 60
Taibu 12*
Matsikenyeri 1
Utseya 0*
Reasonable enough so far? Probably the Masakadza 85 is a bit far fetched, but I don't think it is impossible. Maybe it would be Vermeulen with the higher score and Masakadza with the plain half century. Anyway, let's make it realistic with a Zimbabwe Collapseā¢. Taibu gets out a few balls later for 13, Utseya departs for 4.
Scorecard reads
Masakadza 85
Vermeulen 60
Taibu 13
Matsikenyeri 1
Utseya 4
Chigumbura 1*
Mutizwa 0*
We are now 5/170. Chigumbura and the debutante Mutizwa need to stick around for a while, and they bring some respectability back to the scoreline with a 40 run partnership before Chigumbura departs for 25. Cremer comes in and makes an important 20, leaving Mutizwa with the lower order.
As Mutizwa approaches his half century, wanting to become the first Zimbabwean to make 50 on debut since Duffin, Price plays a silly shot and gets out for 0. Mupariwa is out next ball for 0, the bowler on a hattrick. Rainsford survives the last ball of the over. Mutizwa goes berserk the next over knowing Rainsford won't stick around for long and gets 26 from the over. Rainsford edges the next ball he faces for 4 down to 3rd man, the next one goes straight into the hands of 3rd slip.
Fianl scorecard reads
Masakadza 85
Vermeulen 60
Taibu 13
Matsikenyeri 1
Utseya 4
Chigumbura 25
Mutizwa 71*
Cremer 20
Price 0
Mupariwa 0
Rainsford 4
All out for 295
I place a lot of faith in Mutizwa and our top order. I almost expect the rest to collapse. But as long as 3 people make a half century, then I think we can get to a half decent score. Anything above 250 is not disgraceful I think, although 300 should probably be the "par" score.
1. Hamilton Masakadza 15 - Bat avg 27.06
2. Mark Vermeulen 8 - 25.87
3. Tatenda Taibu 24 - 29.60
4. Stuart Matsikenyeri 8 - 23.40
5. Prosper Utseya - 1 - 22.50
6. Elton Chigumbura 6 - 15.58 / Bowl avg 55.33
7. Forster Mutizwa - debut
8. Graeme Cremer - 6 - Bowl avg 45.76
9. Ray Price - 18 - Bowl avg 35.86
10. Tawanda Mupariwa 1 - Bowl avg undefined
11. Ed Rainsford - debut
I've intentionally left out someone like Malcolm Waller. While his Logan Cup form has been very good in the past few matches, he still doesn't have a First Class century to his name and only a handful of First Class matches.
I haven't gone for the most experienced lineup possible (otherwise you could have Hondo in place of Rainsford, Coventry in place of Mutizwa, etc) but the lineup that has the best mix of form and experience. Just because Nyamuzinga has made more runs than Vermeulen in this series doesn't mean that he would be better prepared for a Test match than Vermeulen.
There are 77 Test matches of experience in that team. Which isn't really that much, but at least there are 9 of 11 guys going into that team with some idea of what to expect. And Rainsford has enough ODI caps behind him to understand what international cricket involves. Mutizwa is the only one who is really fresh at international level, but current form suggests that he would do better than Sibanda, Coventry or Dabengwa.
So at the top of the order we have our best players, the three guys that have a Test hundred under their belt. To escape with a draw (probably anything less than an innings defeat would be considered progress, but hey, a draw has to be the aim) these three guys - Masakadza, Vermeulen and Taibu - need to make at least 50 each, with one of them going on to make a 80+. The most important thing for Zimbabwe is a good start - if we can get to 100 without loss then the worst is behind us (ie. the risk of being 6/40). If we can get to 130 for the loss of 1 then we are past the second danger point (the infamous 3/123 to 10/127 or whatever it was).
So say Masakadza is 60*, Vermeulen 60, we are 1/120. Taibu comes in and sees Masakadza through to a higher score - Masakadza departs on 85 with the score at 2/160 (Taibu 10*, a few extras).
Then we are into the middle order, which by comparison is quite weak for a variety of reasons. The first of which is the presence of Matsikenyeri - we know he is a flat track bully who only seems to get runs against the weakest opposition and when the pressure is off. But, he does have a bit of Test experience. And we know he is brilliant in the field. If he made 20 - 30, then you'd have to consider it a success. But you expect a sub-5 score, so let's say he makes 1.
Scorecard reads
Masakadza 85
Vermeulen 60
Taibu 12*
Matsikenyeri 1
Utseya 0*
Reasonable enough so far? Probably the Masakadza 85 is a bit far fetched, but I don't think it is impossible. Maybe it would be Vermeulen with the higher score and Masakadza with the plain half century. Anyway, let's make it realistic with a Zimbabwe Collapseā¢. Taibu gets out a few balls later for 13, Utseya departs for 4.
Scorecard reads
Masakadza 85
Vermeulen 60
Taibu 13
Matsikenyeri 1
Utseya 4
Chigumbura 1*
Mutizwa 0*
We are now 5/170. Chigumbura and the debutante Mutizwa need to stick around for a while, and they bring some respectability back to the scoreline with a 40 run partnership before Chigumbura departs for 25. Cremer comes in and makes an important 20, leaving Mutizwa with the lower order.
As Mutizwa approaches his half century, wanting to become the first Zimbabwean to make 50 on debut since Duffin, Price plays a silly shot and gets out for 0. Mupariwa is out next ball for 0, the bowler on a hattrick. Rainsford survives the last ball of the over. Mutizwa goes berserk the next over knowing Rainsford won't stick around for long and gets 26 from the over. Rainsford edges the next ball he faces for 4 down to 3rd man, the next one goes straight into the hands of 3rd slip.
Fianl scorecard reads
Masakadza 85
Vermeulen 60
Taibu 13
Matsikenyeri 1
Utseya 4
Chigumbura 25
Mutizwa 71*
Cremer 20
Price 0
Mupariwa 0
Rainsford 4
All out for 295
I place a lot of faith in Mutizwa and our top order. I almost expect the rest to collapse. But as long as 3 people make a half century, then I think we can get to a half decent score. Anything above 250 is not disgraceful I think, although 300 should probably be the "par" score.