Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

For discussion of any non-Zimbabwean cricket.
Kriterion_BD
Posts: 7035
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:41 am

Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by Kriterion_BD »

The fact that there are Full Members, and Associates, and Affiliates - different names and structures - that could be one of the things that could be done away with. You have got a ranking system, I don't see why international teams around the world have to be pigeonholed into different categories and names. I don't see why we have to be an Associate and someone else gets to be a Full Member. I don't see why it exists really
.

Irish captain sounds off about what we all know they think (vis a vis ZIM/BD). However, he hasn't named any team specifically. Anyone know if anyone in the Irish camp (admin, coach, player, board president) has ever explicitly mentioned Zimbabwe (or Bangladesh)? I remember having this discussion with jaybro a few weeks ago...

http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/co ... 58555.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjtuZBykSzM (Noreaga - Blood Money Part 3)

User avatar
maehara
Administrator
Posts: 3986
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:27 pm
Supports: Mashonaland Eagles
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by maehara »

Not that I'm aware of. Irish line has never been that they want to advance at the cost of someone else being 'relegated', and more about them playing a part in expanding the game's reach.

I'd say they see Zim & BD being in much the same boat as they are as far as getting matches against they big boys are concerned - but for as long as the Full / Associate / Affiliate distinction exists, they need to be a Full Member to get a fair crack at what they want.

Kriterion_BD
Posts: 7035
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:41 am

Re: Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by Kriterion_BD »

Maehara, I certainly think that's what the Irish feel. But I too doubt if they say it brazenly. That would just be foolish sounding. But a few have alleged the Irish camp has said stuff like that. The way the ICC treat Ireland is indeed a travesty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjtuZBykSzM (Noreaga - Blood Money Part 3)

User avatar
maehara
Administrator
Posts: 3986
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:27 pm
Supports: Mashonaland Eagles
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by maehara »

Kriterion_BD wrote:The way the ICC treat Ireland is indeed a travesty.
There are Full Members who got their status far more easily than what Ireland are being expected to do, that's for sure - that door was made particularly heavy and hard to move after Bangladesh were 'promoted'. Any objective consideration of what Ireland have been doing over the past 10 years - growing support for the game in Ireland, results by the national teams, structures & sponsorship put into place by Cricket Ireland - should make the decision a gimme, but the ICC just don't operate that way...

samedwards
Posts: 292
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 3:17 pm

Re: Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by samedwards »

I don't know about Zimbabwe, but the former captain Trent Johnston definitely hinted that Bangladesh didn't play Ireland often as they were scared of losing to the Irish.

Kriterion_BD
Posts: 7035
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:41 am

Re: Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by Kriterion_BD »

^ He did mention BD. He may have also mentioned ZIM in the same breath, but definitely mentioned us. And even if he didn't excplicitly say ZIM, he meant ZIM too.

I like that spirit from the Irish. Very healthy level of arrogance. The Afghans go overboard, but even their brashness brings excitement to the game. We now have a rivalry with the Afghans and every 2 years will get to butt heads at the Asia Cup.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjtuZBykSzM (Noreaga - Blood Money Part 3)

User avatar
grant
Posts: 1950
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:57 am
Supports: MidWest Rhinos

Re: Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by grant »

I think Zim, BD, Ire, Afg should play among themselves more often.......

User avatar
maehara
Administrator
Posts: 3986
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:27 pm
Supports: Mashonaland Eagles
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by maehara »

grant wrote:I think Zim, BD, Ire, Afg should play among themselves more often.......
And if the ICC stick to their 10-team World Cup idea, I expect us to play each other ad infinitum as we all try to secure that 8th ranking and avoid having to qualify. De facto 2nd division of ODI cricket, maybe including WI and Pakistan as well. We'll see.

JHunter
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:12 am

Re: Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by JHunter »

maehara wrote:
Kriterion_BD wrote:The way the ICC treat Ireland is indeed a travesty.
There are Full Members who got their status far more easily than what Ireland are being expected to do, that's for sure


No doubt. When South Africa gained full membership in the 1800s they only had 2 day domestic cricket and were clearly not ready.

That said, ALL current full members gained their status on the fact that they had domestic multi-day cricket (even Bangladesh despite the popular misconception otherwise). Something which for years Ireland was extremely negligent about. As I've pointed out elsewhere the Irish really only have themselves to blame in this regard for not making their case stronger years ago.
- that door was made particularly heavy and hard to move after Bangladesh were 'promoted'.


This sounds like a myth to me. I would love to see a source (internet or otherwise) where it is shown that the ICC actually changed the criteria to make it more stringent after Bangladesh gained full membership in 2000.
Any objective consideration of what Ireland have been doing over the past 10 years - growing support for the game in Ireland, results by the national teams, structures & sponsorship put into place by Cricket Ireland - should make the decision a gimme, but the ICC just don't operate that way...
Nope. In the the past 10 years (2005-2015) Ireland have done a lot in terms of growing support for the game in Ireland, gaining sponsorship and having a national team produce results. BUT in terms of one very clear criterion with regards to cricket structure they were attempting to spit into the wind - that of cutting back on the all the fat (in terms of limited overs domestic cricket) and putting in place the right multi-day domestic structure structure to allow for the foundations of first-class cricket and the ability of Ireland to potentially develop test and first-class players without needing to leech off of England's first-class county competition.

Remember Ireland shot to prominence in 2007. Just two years into this 10 year period. They ONLY established a multi-day domestic cricket competition in 2013. A full 8 years into this "past 10 years". Meanwhile they continued with a 50-overs competition that at one point had 35 club teams if I remember rightly (and I well remember years ago discussing this with some Irish cricket fans on cricketeurope and suggesting that the 50-over competition could be reduced in terms of the number of teams and days played and the time and money saved could have been used to start up something like the current 3-day InterProvincial Series...they were not taken up with the idea and insisted that the there was no reason to do that and that the ICC should promote Ireland and give sufficient funding for Ireland to pay its players professionally...at that point I realized further debate was as pointless as discussing great works of literature with a stone wall).

Afghanistan shot to prominence in in 2008 (a year after Ireland) but put in place a 3 day tournament 2 years before Ireland did so...and with considerably less resources and greater challenges.

Had Ireland instituted something like the current Inter Prov Series in say...2009 or even 2010 (and they could have done so, there is no doubt about that), then Ireland would now have had 5-6 seasons of 3-day cricket and perhaps in 2013 could have looked to converting the tournament into a 4-day format as Afghanistan recently did.

Back in 2013, the Irish plan had been to attempt to have the ICC declare their 3-day competition to be of first-class standard by 2015 and to get test status by 2020. If that timeline had been shifted based on a start date of 2009 for the 3-day competition, Cricket Ireland could have aimed for the ICC to adjudge the competition as first-class by 2011 and perhaps be aiming for test status in 2016 (i.e. next year)...

At that point the ICC would be under a lot more pressure to admit Ireland to full membership. Deutrom shot Irish cricket in the foot between 2009 and 2013.

User avatar
CrimsonAvenger
Posts: 9838
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:57 am
Supports: Mountaineers
Location: India

Re: Irish captain: We need more fixtures!

Post by CrimsonAvenger »

That is actually a very important point you make JHunter. In the frnzy of the brazen remarks by the Irish and the on field LOI performances, we forget an important point as this one. Although there might be an argument that the longer format was never in the roadmap of requirements etc., there was no reason why Ireland should not have set that up earlier. It would have only strnegthened their case.

But I can totally understand if they are complaining about lack of LOIs. They need more game time and they are showing their worth regularly.

Post Reply