[Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
That was fucking out. When you super slow mo down a catch it looks like it bounce but it was clearly out, his fingers were underneath it.
Bullshit.
Bullshit.
- brmtaylor.com admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 7924
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
Yeah it looked out.
Umpires are doing their best to help BD here... they said Jarvis can only bowl 9 overs max because the aborted run-up earlier constitutes an over? WHAT?
-
- Posts: 1520
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
- Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
- Location: Benoni, South Africa
- Contact:
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
Don't even know what Raza was trying, referring that one. These religious types can be quite a problem.brmtaylor.com admin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:48 amThat looked pretty obviously out to me...
Soft signal was out, there was nothing I could see to overturn it...
- brmtaylor.com admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 7924
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
Taylor and Ervine need to take about 3 steps forward - the ball is not carrying with our trundlers sending down 120 kmph fireballs
And give Mavuta an over or two against this tailender, given the Jarvis restriction we need to find a few more overs still from the spinners. Williams probably worth an over or two as well.
We can't win either way!
And give Mavuta an over or two against this tailender, given the Jarvis restriction we need to find a few more overs still from the spinners. Williams probably worth an over or two as well.
Yeah, Ervine learnt from that mistake and celebrated like we'd won the World CupConant wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:04 amDon't even know what Raza was trying, referring that one. These religious types can be quite a problem.brmtaylor.com admin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 21, 2018 8:48 amThat looked pretty obviously out to me...
Soft signal was out, there was nothing I could see to overturn it...
We can't win either way!
- kudet
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:05 am
- Supports: MidWest Rhinos
- Location: Harare, Zimbabwe
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
hey guys balance me real quick here.. how is it that jarvis is said to be allowed to bowl 9 overs only.. rainsford was saying that the fact that he had attempted to make a run up to the delivery point constitutes an over??
- brmtaylor.com admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 7924
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
I don't understand either - seems like a rule made up on the spot.
Dumb captaincy then... why not bring the field in to stop that single?
- brmtaylor.com admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 7924
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
We really are useless at pressing an advantage.
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
Bangers running away with it now. Kayes raping Chatara
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
I think it would've been better to bowl Jarvis out during those middle overs when he picked up those wickets.
He looks useless at the death.
Well they are all useless at the death tbf
He looks useless at the death.
Well they are all useless at the death tbf
- brmtaylor.com admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 7924
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe 1st ODI
The last 10 overs have been disgraceful. 280 is on the cards now.
I agree. May as well have bowled him out while he was still economical. No matter who we put on in the last 5 will go at 10+ an over.