[Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
-
- Posts: 4944
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:39 am
- Supports: Mountaineers
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
It's been awhile since the last Ervine vs Matsi debate ...
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
At the moment I would take Craig.
Neil Johnson, Alistair Campbell, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), Grant Flower, Dave Houghton, Guy Whittall, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Ray Price, Eddo Brandes
-
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:03 pm
- Supports: Southern Rocks
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
i'm not talking Matsi ... no reason to flog a dead horse (regardless of who killed it!)foreignfield wrote:It's been awhile since the last Ervine vs Matsi debate ...
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
foreignfield wrote:It's been awhile since the last Ervine vs Matsi debate ...
Well one thing is for sure, Jarvis is better than Rainsford.
Neil Johnson, Alistair Campbell, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), Grant Flower, Dave Houghton, Guy Whittall, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Ray Price, Eddo Brandes
-
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:03 pm
- Supports: Southern Rocks
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
of course you would .. in Zim cricket the grass is always greenereugene wrote:At the moment I would take Craig.
+ it's much easier to discard a struggling employee than to nuture them through the struggles - regardless of their prior contributions - especially when there's someone who is managing to do the job right now to a certain acceptable standard. It's easier certainly...
- brmtaylor.com admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 7940
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
What's with the obsession with run rate on the commentary?
I couldn't care less what the run rate is as long as these two make it through to stumps. It's all about time and survival. Odds are we'll need a Faf du Plessis like 2-day-effort in the fourth innings to save the match, so every over we bat now is one less we have to worry about later.
I couldn't care less what the run rate is as long as these two make it through to stumps. It's all about time and survival. Odds are we'll need a Faf du Plessis like 2-day-effort in the fourth innings to save the match, so every over we bat now is one less we have to worry about later.
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
I think we are going well. If anything, Taylor and Waller proved that its not the run rate that counts but staying on and building a nice partnership..
- brmtaylor.com admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 7940
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
The grass certainly is greener when your current grass is fat and useless.betterdays wrote:of course you would .. in Zim cricket the grass is always greenereugene wrote:At the moment I would take Craig.
+ it's much easier to discard a struggling employee than to nuture them through the struggles - regardless of their prior contributions - especially when there's someone who is managing to do the job right now to a certain acceptable standard. It's easier certainly...
Neil Johnson, Alistair Campbell, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), Grant Flower, Dave Houghton, Guy Whittall, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Ray Price, Eddo Brandes
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v Bangladesh: 2nd Test
Got nothing against Dion Ebrahim, but Taylor needs to at the very least overtake him during this innings for us to stand a chance:
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/zimbabwe/ ... ;type=team
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/zimbabwe/ ... ;type=team
Peterhouse U14C 4th change bowler and no. 10 batsman (but only because Aaron didn't have a bat).