Let's be honest, the Herald is not exactly a source of reliable and truthful info. In saying that, the men were not paid for two months before they went on tour. ZC could still have given the money that was meant to have been put aside for the womens tour to the interim board and allowed the tour to go ahead without any issues.TapsC wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 9:01 am
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.herald ... r-off/amp/
When did the SRC suspend ZC? Thats when you will find out that salaries stopped coming. Dont you remember the ladies not touring Europe and players not being paid? That happened when they got suspended. I'm not an idiot . You need to pay attention more instead of just lashing out. As a journalist yourself you know how important getting the facts right is. If you say they hadnt been paid their may salaries too then we can start from there.
The funding issue was not caused by the SRC. A tour does not all of a sudden lose money if it has been in the works for months. I have worked in sport and sport administration for too long to know all this.
Don't forget the countless others times in the past where players and staff have not been paid under a ZC board. Damn domestic guys are getting $10 a day and not even getting food.
Let's hypothetically say you work for a company. They constantly pay you late and in some instances you have to go months without a salary. They also promote someone else ahead of you despite you having the skills and experience, but the other guy got it because he rubbed the bosses knob. Another company comes up to you and offers you a job. They promise better working conditions at the position you want and most importantly, they guarantee to pay you on time all the time.rather watch my country burn wrote:Lawyer or no lawyer, 'being paid late' and 'not being paid at all' are two VERY different things.
Do you stick with your current company or do you take the new job offer.