Your interpretation of various words is entertaining, Hhm. It is rare to see words like "unjustified" handled like this.hhm wrote:I don't think I've come across better statements than this during my entire time in this forumbetterdays wrote:I think these bowlers all look good, they do actually look like they're full of potential but the team looks like a team with a five-year plan ... in some ways we've gone backwards...to a place where everyone was an absolute newbie who needed to learn on the job. maybe this test it's been forced on us a little but they've gone for this young and vibrant idea without having a few guys to absorb the inevitable blows.![]()
As I no doubt continue to receive a barrage of unjustified slightings from unforgiving sections of this forum, because I stand by similar, I shall constantly visit this particular post for comfort!
[Match Thread] New Zealand vs Zimbabwe, Only Test
Re: [Match Thread] New Zealand vs Zimbabwe, Only Test
-
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:03 pm
- Supports: Southern Rocks
Re: [Match Thread] New Zealand vs Zimbabwe, Only Test
yup - and they bowled Cremer too long.Jemisi wrote:Things seem to be settling, which is a worry. NZ are putting themselves back together. We need to ruffle them somehow
Re: [Match Thread] New Zealand vs Zimbabwe, Only Test
One thing I worry about Taylor's captaincy is his bowling changes. They seem clunky.
Re: [Match Thread] New Zealand vs Zimbabwe, Only Test
Looking more threatening here
Re: [Match Thread] New Zealand vs Zimbabwe, Only Test
Another dropped off Jarvis - what a joke.
Re: [Match Thread] New Zealand vs Zimbabwe, Only Test
Thanfully the drop doesn't cost us anything
Re: [Match Thread] New Zealand vs Zimbabwe, Only Test
Cremer needs to show something here
Re: [Match Thread] New Zealand vs Zimbabwe, Only Test
What a disgraceful over from Cremer.