Can't agree more with the minister, and actually I think he is being diplomatic. I remember saying somewhere on this forum, we could have fined Vusi a percentage of his match fee or something, but not unsettle a fragile batting line up "just to prove a point"...result is we have taken a dozen step back, and people like Hami whose confidence was on an edge may never recover, and spare a thought for the likes of Matsi and Mutizwa and to an extent Chakabva, all their good work is now marred, and (conspiracy like) some of us are even jumping on these poor guys' backs...oblivious of the fact they have been set up to fail.Dr_Situ(ZimFanatic) wrote:The top order of Hami and Matsi is the problem. They get bogged down and put undue pressure on the rest. We dont need openers from Curran-Duffin era and we are seriously missing Coventry hereZimbabwe's Minister of Sport David Coltart on Twitter: "As in the Test not a bad bowling performance but we are being let down by our batting top order. Do we need to swallow some humble pie?"
Aside: I seem to be totally convinced we are using Meth and Vittori wrongly, as I said in an earlier post, I think these lads are being played in the wrong formats, i.e. I think Meth is a longer form bowler and Vitori a limited overs bowler, just look at their records, domestically and internationally and you will see what I mean, very much like Matsi and Mutizwa. Matsi seemed to fail in Tests and Logan cup, but seems to do that much better in limited overs cricket, and inversely for Mutizwa, who hasn't done terribly in ODI and Pro50, but hardly amazing, but does markedly better in Logan Cup and hopefully if given a chance will do so in test. Unfortunately for them the selectors and ZC as a whole has sold them down the stream, by the insane decisions to send them up the order in the face of a very shaky and makeshift opening pair (in Matsi's case he has had to be that opener, and Mutizwa has virtually played this opening role in the Test!)
But yes, "humble pie anyone?"



