Surprisingly he did acknowledged his short comings. I was actually shocked he did. I dont have issues with him anymore.Googly wrote: ↑Sun Aug 20, 2023 6:22 pmWhy would you be talking to Bvute? I very much doubt he acknowledged his own shortcomings.
The current hierarchy know exactly how much money he took and yet have made no attempt to recover any of it.
There will be a paper trail a mile long that is there to act upon. Unfortunately we know why there's no action.
Imagine the stress if we had to pick an A side and an Emerging side at the same time!
Is it better to pick experienced players to try and limit the damage? That usually backfires because we often get trounced anyway. We play so little high grade cricket it's almost worth sending capped and fringe players.
It would be interesting to know who picks these teams.
These A side and Emerging side games are generally really disheartening because it exposes our complete lack of depth AND often the stupidity and nepotism (and often racism) of the "selectors".
It also exposes that below the national side level there's not much thought. They go through the motions as a box ticking exercise. There's no real effort to find meaningful solutions.
A big step in the right direction would be an HPC with a couple of quality coaches and not packed with marginal players who will never make the grade as that would be a complete and utter waste of time.
If they can only find 6 guys that are worth focusing on then so be it, but they need to finally get serious about this.
I'm curious how much prep these guys had as a squad.
As for the board they are doing the same how do you expect them to act? Mind you its pretty much same board during his time except one or 2 people.
You pointed out a few thought provoking issues there. Personally i feel we have to make tough decision and reap the benefits in the long run. Initially forget about results in the first year of the emerging side, identify and nature talent that can be worked with. Its painful to get trounced day in and day out but looking at the bigger picture you are building something. After a year fuse those emerging players identified with select U19 guys who would have got back from the WC and you have an A side. The remaining U19 guys gets into the emerging side giving them a second chance to prove themselves as cant really judge them by a single WC appearance. They will be mixed with those that failed to make the final squad.
Doing so bridges the current gap we have between U19 and ZimA/First Class .
If you have people with cricketing brains i tell you it doesnt take more than 4 years to develop a good system and Zimbabwe will be competing well on the international stage. But to do so we have to make tough, unpopular and uncomfortable decisions. It will be a long and painful experience but can be done. I mean since 2003 how many good U19 players have we lost just after WC?