Pat_Bee wrote: ↑Tue May 27, 2025 8:29 pm
andrea lanzoni wrote: ↑Tue May 27, 2025 11:52 am
I would like to watch Logan Cup if it were decently televised: watching the pitch only for hours is not appealing

It’s a top quality stream. A camera at both ends is the only improvement that needs. Serves its purpose of seeing how a guy bats and bowls.
The quality of the stream is acceptable.
What I pointed out is that after batting you are left in the domain of guessing: where the ball is going? Will be there a fielder to catch it? Will it go trespassing the boundary or not?
Then you see a ball coming from nowhere returning to keeper and to bowler for the following bowl.
Such fragmented broadcasting doesn't appeal anyone.
If you simply add another, fixed, camera on the other side of the pitch it doesn't help at all. What's needed is a zooming-back which allows to follow, although not in close-up, the ball where it goes. This may be obtained from the only camera on field, provided it's not a stand alone camera with no operator of course.
As I said (several times) a decent broadcasting would then have a worldwide audience and be paid back by sponsors. NOT local sponsors: if the audience is worldwide you may have from overseas.
Finally: Italy cricket is ... "fourth world" with infinite less resources than ZC, however live stream of matches covering the pitch only is common even here.