Conant wrote:Tristan Holme professes to air out Prosper Utseya's side in this interview. But he's already judged and taken a side long before this article
Can't agree with that. I thought even before the article came up that Tristan would have written the article without getting Utseya's viewpoint and it would not have much to expect, but he has put these questions to him and we now know Prosper's mind on some of these "accusations" he gets. I don't think he has been judgmental anywhere, and has put up the case of both sides clearly (if anything, Utseya's side more clearly).
Quoting Utseya:
"But because the game kept on evolving, you start doing things and start developing bad habits. It was very difficult in the sense that, after ten years of playing, you get banned. Now I'm a family man, I have to put food on the table for my family."
"People might say that you've been playing for ten years and you should have invested and have something on the side that can keep you going, but the truth of the matter is that we don't get as well paid as we are supposed to. Also coming from humble beginnings, first you have to look after your parents. You have to make sure that you buy a house for them and cater for them first. That took about six years, and then you have to start looking after yourself and your family. You're starting a new life for your family, and then you get banned."
I understand all of that and respect how people overcome the difficulties in troubled economies, putting the interests of the family before your own. Having said that, while representing your country in anything, you must put country first. Your personal troubles should not matter at the level of the country (in a competition). Let someone else who appear to be better at the instant take over and participate in the country's progress. If you are not good enough to represent your country, just move on to another source of income. Put in the hard yards. Life is unfair sometimes, but your integrity is what matters in the end.
Quoting the Cremer example is sick and very convenient for your narration. Even if it was not for Cremer (who was not in picture for the world cup anyway), there were Nyumbu, Wellington, Mufudza, etc. who could have gone to the world cup rightfully, given the right chances. Given the performances till then, There was no way Nyumbu was any inferior to the new unknown bowler Utseya. He has no case here.
"My selection was criticised, but when I look at it, none of the spinners performed in Bangladesh [in late 2014], and I did better than the other spinners against Canada. No one can tell me that I didn't deserve to go to the World Cup, because it was based on statistics."
That, again, is just looking at things from your own individual point of view, and how you lose respect. Spinners not performing in BD (in a single series) is not the reason to throw them away never to return. They are known entities at least, and in case of Nyumbu, his home leg last season was filled with sparkling performances (for a rookie at international stage) and Wellington, having done well in BD in the A series, never got a chance to prove his worth with the main team.
(P.S.: This article is about Utseya, and hence focusing my comments on his statements. I have expressed my displeasure at AC's methods in the past. So, pointing out flaws in Utseya's approach and arguments do not necessarily mean that I support the other camp, if any such thing exists.)