Page 1 of 1

How the Domestic team/seasons should be structured

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:28 am
by ZIMDOGGY
Going on from the Nathan Waller thread, this deserves its own thread.

The Zimdoggy proposal to re-vamp the domestic league.
This is based in realism and nods to cost effectiveness.
Three teams;
Harare
Bulawayo
Midlands/Kwekwe/greater Mashonaland etc.

Squads of contracted 15 players allocated to a designated salary cap, plus a b salary to pay for those outside the cap at a certain negotiated min rate. If teams need to go outside the ten reserve list, they can.
2 players on top of the 15 who are 21 or under cap excluded as development players. Qouta of 4 players under 23 at a minimum (including the 21s should they wish to utilize the salary cap exclusion, which would be wise).
1x Overseas marquee player per squad allowed outside the cap. Any other overseas pros fall within the 15. Max of 2.

Logan cup;
All teams play each other 4 times, home and away. Grand final to determine winner.

One dayers.
All teams play each other 4 times, home and away. Best of 3 grand final to determine winner. If dead rubber after 2. Dont worry.

t20.
One festival at Bulawayo, the other in Harare.
Bring in a 4th developmental squad based on academy players or 'best of the rest' players. Good chance for a foreigner, a sean ervine style expat looking to return, or a keith dabengwa or matsi type to still play and show some experience to the 70% rest of the squad. In world cup years, this could even be the under 19 squad. Australia did something similar last season with their 'CA 11' team in the one day series, that included Zimbabwes own Hilton Cartwright. Who was probably one of two players to step up and shine.


All players are required to spread the gospel during the week as a part of their full time contract.
Go to schools etc.

Behind the scenes focus on developing the Harare Metro league as a good feeder/audition to the domestic big leagues.

Re: How the Domestic team/seasons should be structured

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 6:49 am
by Detective RDS
Excellent thread opened up by Zimdoggy. Indeed we were going all guns blazing regarding domestic cricket revamp on Nathan Waller thread.

My proposal regarding domestic cricket:

6 months domestic cricket season (Oct-Mar ?)

Competition: Logan Cup (FC), Pro 50 championship (List A), T20 championship (T20)

Number of teams: 5 (minimum)
I prefer franchise system, 1 Matabeleland Tuskers, 2 Mashonaland Eagles, 3 Midwest Rhinos, 4 Mountaineers, 5 Southern Rocks or a new franchise.
If provincial system, (Matabeleland/Mashonaland/Midlands/Masvingo/Manicaland) OR (Northerns/Southerns/Easterns/Westerns/Centrals)

Squad composition: 15 contracted players for each 5 teams at a fixed salary. For players outside the contract, there should be a minimum salary.
Maximum 2 overseas player per team outside 15 contracted players.

Development targets:

1. Invest in youth. Minimum 2 development players (U/23) per team is encouraged.
2. All teams are encouraged to build an infrastructure where the development programs can be initiated. Matabeleland Tuskers has their own academy.
http://www.chronicle.co.zw/wayne-james- ... s-academy/
http://www.chronicle.co.zw/tuskers-acad ... into-life/
http://www.chronicle.co.zw/tuskers-offe ... o-schools/
3. Club cricket, age group cricket & school cricket should be emphasized.
4. All the teams are encouraged to have talent scouts/talent spotters/talent identifiers.
5. Outside the competition, Zim A or development squad/academy side or U/23 or U/19 side can play against franchise/domestic side. Say for example, A FC match between Zim A vs Matabeleland Tuskers (Logan cup winner). India often does that i.e. Ranji trophy winner vs Rest of India.
6. All the teams are encouraged to run their official website or use twitter in order to provide news, interviews & insights.
7. More matches & tours should be arranged for A team, development side/academy side or U/23 or U/19 side.

Re: How the Domestic team/seasons should be structured

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:25 am
by TapsC
seems like people will never agree on the number of first class teams on this forum. I must say I am beginning to see the light in terms of having less FC teams than more.5 or 6 is too many because our talent pool is not big enough and this might be affecting our players development because a lot of the games they play have some substandard players.a lot of the big nations only have about 6 teams but they also have a strong club cricket structure.something we dont have.but less teams would allow us too use some of our limited resources on the metro leagues if corruption somehow doesn't get in the way

the only thing I know for sure is that it shouldn't be easy to play first class cricket.

Re: How the Domestic team/seasons should be structured

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:28 pm
by Detective RDS
Explained in depth why I support 5 domestic teams of Zimbabwe:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12152

Re: How the Domestic team/seasons should be structured

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:07 am
by sloandog
How good is it having the Detective back; breathing fresh life into the Forum

Re: How the Domestic team/seasons should be structured

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:10 am
by eugene
sloandog wrote:How good is it having the Detective back; breathing fresh life into the Forum
I thought watermelon had done that?

Re: How the Domestic team/seasons should be structured

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:00 pm
by Detective RDS
sloandog wrote:How good is it having the Detective back; breathing fresh life into the Forum
Thank you. I really miss your point of views though & your so many clicks in bowling speed in your post. :)

I got busy with study, work, other activities. But it was frustrating to see Zimbabwe not playing international cricket more often. Got really upset in the ODI series against India. But Zim played well in the 1st & 3rd T20Is. There are potential and I have liked both Cremer & Ntini. In between dug deep into Zimbabwean cricket news in various websites. Hope I can contribute something to ZCF.