Common sense!
1. Wellington just turned 24 compared to Chisoro who is 30 in a few days.
2. Wellington averages ODIs-25.06, T20s 24.63, FC 22.89; while Chisoro averages ODIs 26.38, T20s 17.30, FC 40.87
3. Both can bowl with the new ball, middle overs and at the death. Effective in power plays.
Wellington is not just a better prospect than Chisoro, he's also a better prospect than Cremer in my view! Has far much greater control.
His latest FC innings is more than decent too... Sean, Craig, Chari and Mutumbami plus Mpofu and Vitori to a lesser extent - all internationals can agree.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/8794 ... p-2017-18/
. .
Wellington was 22 when he made his international debut for Zimbabwe. Imagine how brilliant he would be now if he was given the space to develop in international cricket. Laughable to think that Cremer(47 Test Avg) and Chisoro (38 Test Avg), deputised by Raza (57 test Avg) are Zimbabwe's leading spin options. That's why Zimbabwe has a non-existent brains trust. Tragic that fans don't seem bothered or will defend mediocrity ahead of excellent potential.
.
NB: Constant references to race are misguided and cowardly. As much as Burl deserves a run ahead of Malcolm, why would it be wrong to argue that likewise Mutombodzi deserves a run ahead of Williams. In the same vein, why turn to Mire ahead of the likes of Kasuza? Or even Prince and Timecyn who have sound FC records?