Do Zim batsmen overachieve on test debut and then taper off?
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2021 6:47 am
Out of the 15 guys who have scored 50+ on their test debut for Zim (isn't that a high number in general if we consider just a handful of batsmen who have ever played for us in tests?), 7 made good to decent progress and 7 others tapered off.
Half the Zimbo debut half-centurions could not do better on their later assignments. What does that tell us? Why did so many of them peak right at the beginning? Do they ride on the nervous energies of the debut to do their best, and once they achieved the ultimate (that is to represent their country at the highest level), do they lack further motivation? What explains this according to you?
Did well or decently even after the debut highs:
Houghton, Goodwin, A Flower, G Flower, Masakadza, Raza, Moor
Fell off after the debut highs:
A Waller, M Waller, Gripper, Rennie, Matsikenyeri, Duffin, Kasuza
Yet to figure out:
Kaitano
Half the Zimbo debut half-centurions could not do better on their later assignments. What does that tell us? Why did so many of them peak right at the beginning? Do they ride on the nervous energies of the debut to do their best, and once they achieved the ultimate (that is to represent their country at the highest level), do they lack further motivation? What explains this according to you?
Did well or decently even after the debut highs:
Houghton, Goodwin, A Flower, G Flower, Masakadza, Raza, Moor
Fell off after the debut highs:
A Waller, M Waller, Gripper, Rennie, Matsikenyeri, Duffin, Kasuza
Yet to figure out:
Kaitano