Similarly do you (or anyone else) on this forum know the difference betwen Newtonian mechanics and Quantum and Relativistic Mechanics? I would not be surprised if ZCF members would suggest that physics is bullshit because all of a sudden the laws of mechanics changed. The laws didn't change...our depth of understanding changed, and although Newtons laws of physics are now known to be incorrect (vis a vis Einstein's and Heisenburg's)...it is still taught at every university up to and including Harvard and Princeton. Why you might ask? Because for everyday scenarios, Newton's laws come to out be 99.999999% accurate and work just fine. Einstein's are 100% accurate by the way...or at least what we currently understand to be 100% accurate.
You are deeply disturbed
Anybody can Google Heisenberg, De Broglie and Schrodinger and at least beat you in an argument using Grade 8 comprehension skills
Let me correct you just by a simple copy and paste.
It didn’t. It extended Newtonian physics by making it more general and precise.
Newton’s First and Third laws of motion survived 20th century physics unscathed.
Newton’s Second Law F=dp/dt is still true, we just have a slightly modified definition for momentum that is more precise at high speeds than Newton’s p=mv.
Newton’s law of gravitation suffered the most at the hands of contemporary relativity, but the mathematical form is still very accurate until you get incredibly close to a massive object, or try to describe the trajectory of light.
To put it simply, Newtonian physics still survives as the low-speed and weak-gravity limit of contemporary physics. It was never “destroyed” and is still an extremely effective tool for describing motion in most normally-encountered situations in the universe.
Please don't argue
, I just don't have the time to learn more than you in my spare hour.
I think stick to wiping bums- golden rule ...front to back.