eugene wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 4:13 am
Except Fauci wasn't following the evidence, he was trying to suppress it.
Look if you don’t have a background in STEM you can’t tell what the evidence says. So how would you know he was trying to suppress evidence? Do you know what a chi squared analysis is? Do you know about T tests?
Your side doesn’t have evidence because your side doesn’t believe in science or observational empiricism. You don’t believe a barrier blocks particles, right? Therefore, you must not believe that condoms work to reduce disease transmission or pregnancy rates, right?
Just as an example, following conventional scientific understandings, no one could have predicted the possibility of nuclear bombs. But when the discovery was made that fission and fusion could result in minuscule “losses” in mass it became apparent that mass was being converted to energy. Before that, and in common sense, if you started with 1 kg og material, you would end with 1kg as well.