[Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
very nearly 5
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
Surely it is Richmond who has lost 10kg? He is razor thin
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
Good hard fighting. Can't believe we are still in the game after two days.
- brmtaylor.com admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 7940
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
- Contact:
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
Conceded a few more runs in the end than I would have liked to see. Given the way Panyangara and Chatara were bowling earlier, I reckon we could have restricted them to 180. But nonetheless, 4/201 isn't bad and we go into day 3 holding a slim lead still which is pretty impressive.
Unfortunately, de Kock seems to be treating the Titans of Test Cricket as if they are a minnow - throwing the bat at anything and everything. du Plessis is showing some more respect to the bowling. I hope that we can get de Kock very early tomorrow, and then have Chatara and Panyangara bowl long spells in the hope (it's a slim hope) that we can still be leading at lunch tomorrow.
The slower we can make them bat, the more likely a draw becomes.
Unfortunately, de Kock seems to be treating the Titans of Test Cricket as if they are a minnow - throwing the bat at anything and everything. du Plessis is showing some more respect to the bowling. I hope that we can get de Kock very early tomorrow, and then have Chatara and Panyangara bowl long spells in the hope (it's a slim hope) that we can still be leading at lunch tomorrow.
The slower we can make them bat, the more likely a draw becomes.
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
well the odds of getting to day 5 are looking better at any rate
- Kriterion_BD
- Posts: 7605
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:41 am
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
This is a superb showing by ZIM!
a draw is now a distinct possibility. Let's do some math:
SA have to budget for at least 500 runs, and at 201-4 they likely won't get there. Assuming they get 350 at 2.7 an over ( factor some acceleration) that is 130 overs. That takes us to the middle of day 3. Half the test remains. ZIM would then have to bat big, trailing by 100. If they bat until the end of day 4, ~140 overs, at 2.7 an over that is a total of 378, a lead of around 280. SA would fancy chasing that down.
Thus, to draw ZIM will actually want SA to go slow and use up time and then bat big in the 3rd innings. If you score quicker, ZIM may even get into a position of trying to bowl SA out and win!
a draw is now a distinct possibility. Let's do some math:
SA have to budget for at least 500 runs, and at 201-4 they likely won't get there. Assuming they get 350 at 2.7 an over ( factor some acceleration) that is 130 overs. That takes us to the middle of day 3. Half the test remains. ZIM would then have to bat big, trailing by 100. If they bat until the end of day 4, ~140 overs, at 2.7 an over that is a total of 378, a lead of around 280. SA would fancy chasing that down.
Thus, to draw ZIM will actually want SA to go slow and use up time and then bat big in the 3rd innings. If you score quicker, ZIM may even get into a position of trying to bowl SA out and win!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYq6auq5cyQ (Jaylen Brown, 2024 NBA Finals MVP)
- Kriterion_BD
- Posts: 7605
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:41 am
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
YES!
The slower we can make them bat, the more likely a draw becomes.
They're only going at 2.39 an over which is unheard of in this era. Zim have already achieved that target. If you can keep their overall runrate under 2.7 for the entire innings, a draw will be that much closer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYq6auq5cyQ (Jaylen Brown, 2024 NBA Finals MVP)
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
The problem is that Zimbabwe rarely scores big in the second innings. We are very much a first innings team.
Neil Johnson, Alistair Campbell, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), Grant Flower, Dave Houghton, Guy Whittall, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Ray Price, Eddo Brandes
- Kriterion_BD
- Posts: 7605
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:41 am
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
Isn't everybody?eugene wrote:The problem is that Zimbabwe rarely scores big in the second innings. We are very much a first innings team.
Well that's how matches are drawn so heres hoping. Regardless, ZIM have so far not done any harm to their reputation. In fact its been enhanced. For teams like BD and ZIM (and even WI) its not about wins or losses but the manner ie the margin that counts.
Last edited by Kriterion_BD on Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYq6auq5cyQ (Jaylen Brown, 2024 NBA Finals MVP)
Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v South Africa: Only Test
Fair point. I just remember a few too many second innings collapses I guess.Kriterion_BD wrote:Isn't everybody?eugene wrote:The problem is that Zimbabwe rarely scores big in the second innings. We are very much a first innings team.
Well that's how matches are drawn so heres hoping.
Neil Johnson, Alistair Campbell, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), Grant Flower, Dave Houghton, Guy Whittall, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Ray Price, Eddo Brandes
