Think you've had a mare here.ZIMDOGGY wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 2:37 pmNo because white people brough the game to Zim, and ran it themselves and are still the better players and are only being sidelined for politics.secretzimbo wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 2:34 pmI'm pretty sure most if not all of their Indian players were born and raised in Kenya and know only Kenya.ZIMDOGGY wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 2:33 pm
20 years ago they played 8/3 local ratio now its flipped.
Here is their WC squad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template: ... _Cup_squad
Saying there's too many Indians in their team is a bit like if you were saying there is too many whites in ours? No?
That would be more apt if the game was originally all black and whites muscled in, and that would be a criticism of ZC chasing blacks away.
Different situation completely.
Not really sure how you can complain there isn't enough White players in the Zim XI but then complain there is too many Indian players in the Kenyan XI.
I reckon the best eligible local XI should be selected? I don't know enough about current Kenyan cricket and I assume you don't either to suggest with any confidence that the Indian guys in their team are not deserving of their spots. They all appear to be Kenyan citizens, born there and learnt cricket there.
Uganda handing passports to 3 of their players 2 weeks before the tournament started is a bit more sketchy, yes, but for most of the other associates, around the world almost always the Asians in their teams are the best available players. Suggesting they select shitter 'local', 'native' players of the right colour instead is basically saying you support everything that was bad about ZC at its very worst.