ok, a bit more than edged itKriterion_BD wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 6:18 amZIM killed that session. 90 runs at 3 an over and only lost 2 wickets? Thats a good session in a regular match...with a 140 lead its money in the bank.
[Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
It costs too much money sadly, otherwise it would make sense for them to play 3-4 Test series against each other
Chairman of the Neville Madziva fan Club
Originator of the #mumbamania movement
Originator of the #mumbamania movement
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
I wonder if we will ever play a three test series again
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
A naughty brain fade after setting things up
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
I think 320 should be more than enough to defend...Anything above that would be bonus
- CrimsonAvenger
- Posts: 9859
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:57 am
- Supports: Mountaineers
- Location: India
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
Totally needless. He had no reason to play that. He was probably playing one of his best knocks in recent times by the looks of Cricinfo commentary...
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
Is there any rain on the cards?
Re: [Match Thread] Bangladesh v Zimbabwe : 1st Test, Sylhet
He was very solid until thatCrimsonAvenger wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 7:03 amTotally needless. He had no reason to play that. He was probably playing one of his best knocks in recent times by the looks of Cricinfo commentary...
