You can't be reasoning by comparison in 2016? really. How many arguments can we launch with this kind of reasoning because theres thousands of people in the world 6'4 or more who cant bowl.Zimdoggy wrote:
But fast bowling isn't a given coincidence of height.
There are many tall people who couldn't crack 100 who are tall.
im 6'4 and I cant bowl anywhere near it.
Thats all besides the point. It seems like we don't know the qualities of a good bowler. A good test standard bowler:
1. Has reasonable pace (134kph+)
2. Has reasonable height to generate reasonable bounce.
3. Has variation in the form of either swing, seam, bounce.
In international cricket, you have to be very talented to trouble a batsmen bowling at less than 134kph. If you look at the best bowlers in the world like starc and steyn, they all swing the ball at 140kph+ and compare that with a medium pacer who swings the ball at 127kph.
It doesn't mean a good bowler has all the qualities listed above, either of the above are almost good enough. And not every bowler who bowls at 134kph has the variation to trouble most batsmen in the world
