2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Participate in discussion with your fellow Zimbabwe cricket fans!
ZIMDOGGY
Posts: 7095
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:40 pm
Supports: MidWest Rhinos

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by ZIMDOGGY »

btw wasnt afghanitan meant to be banned because of no female teams?
Cricinfo profile of the 'James Bond' of cricket:

FULL NAME: Angus James Mackay
BORN: 13 June 1967, Harare
KNOWN AS: Gus Mackay

'The' Gus Mackay.

Hero.
Sportsman.
Artist.
Player.

**
Q. VUSI SIBANDA, WHERE DO YOU HOP?

A. UNDA DA ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE*

secretzimbo
Posts: 9975
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:08 pm

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by secretzimbo »

ZIMDOGGY wrote:
Tue Feb 01, 2022 10:02 pm
btw wasnt afghanitan meant to be banned because of no female teams?
Not 'banned' as such.

There is (still) a condition of Full Membership that you enter a women's team into all ICC pathway events. But then they haven't ever entered one ever since being given full membership in 2017, so clearly the ICC never cared, and gave them an unofficial exception.

There was renewed focus and attention on this in light of the Taliban turning up last year, but still no action taken. Afghanistan have not been meeting this clear criteria for five years already but everyone just turns a blind eye.

To be fair, Ireland are also flouting a membership criteria which states Full Members have to run a domestic First Class competition. Ireland haven't since 2019 and are now planning to shelve it long-term.

Imagine if Zimbabwe ever flouted a membership criteria :lol: We'd be banned quicker than you can say 'biased'. :lol:



In theory, if the ICC ever decided to stick to its own rules and criteria, and stripped the Afghans of Test status, they could of course still play the other format of the game and would still be in World Cup's and U19's as an Associate. Associate membership criteria does explicitly allow an exemption on women's teams for 'cultural reasons'.

ZIMDOGGY
Posts: 7095
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:40 pm
Supports: MidWest Rhinos

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by ZIMDOGGY »

secretzimbo wrote:
Tue Feb 01, 2022 10:30 pm
ZIMDOGGY wrote:
Tue Feb 01, 2022 10:02 pm
btw wasnt afghanitan meant to be banned because of no female teams?
Not 'banned' as such.

There is (still) a condition of Full Membership that you enter a women's team into all ICC pathway events. But then they haven't ever entered one ever since being given full membership in 2017, so clearly the ICC never cared, and gave them an unofficial exception.

There was renewed focus and attention on this in light of the Taliban turning up last year, but still no action taken. Afghanistan have not been meeting this clear criteria for five years already but everyone just turns a blind eye.

To be fair, Ireland are also flouting a membership criteria which states Full Members have to run a domestic First Class competition. Ireland haven't since 2019 and are now planning to shelve it long-term.

Imagine if Zimbabwe ever flouted a membership criteria :lol: We'd be banned quicker than you can say 'biased'. :lol:



In theory, if the ICC ever decided to stick to its own rules and criteria, and stripped the Afghans of Test status, they could of course still play the other format of the game and would still be in World Cup's and U19's as an Associate. Associate membership criteria does explicitly allow an exemption on women's teams for 'cultural reasons'.
yeah get rid of them. fuck 'em.
Cricinfo profile of the 'James Bond' of cricket:

FULL NAME: Angus James Mackay
BORN: 13 June 1967, Harare
KNOWN AS: Gus Mackay

'The' Gus Mackay.

Hero.
Sportsman.
Artist.
Player.

**
Q. VUSI SIBANDA, WHERE DO YOU HOP?

A. UNDA DA ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE*

BostonZimbo
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2021 7:48 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by BostonZimbo »

What did Bell have to day about their age? I'm intrigued

Googly
Posts: 17950
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:48 pm

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by Googly »

It was subtle, but he said they knew what to expect from their bowlers as they'd watched a couple of them on the Big Bash, but had a grin as he said it.
He wasn't quite at eye roll level but it was there, wasn't imagining it, I swear! :lol:

cricket_22001
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:20 pm

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by cricket_22001 »

West Indies & Sri Lanka are also in their second season of non FC domestic comp. India as well but apparently that’s starting later. All three have organised white ball comps.
The ICC, which moves slower than glacial melting, would still be dishing out the dough. Especially in Covid affected times. I see issues with the Windies as each island is a country & theoretically quarantine is necessary.
But India & Sri Lanka have held zonal FC comps in he past ( the Duleep Trophy was a staple part of the Indian calendar). That’s all they need to organise. But India appear to be beholden to Ranji Trophy teams & the Lankan to their club team format.
Ireland’s 2019 season was very wet & they had quite a few washouts. Maybe they’ve realised their country is unsuitable for red ball cricket. But still take the money.

Googly
Posts: 17950
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:48 pm

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by Googly »

India off to a slow start. Aus bowling beautiful line and length. 15-0 after 7

Googly
Posts: 17950
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:48 pm

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by Googly »

Top 3 teams have the 3 most successful opening partnerships.

Googly
Posts: 17950
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:48 pm

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by Googly »

Indian commentators have been pumping up their quick bowler, haven't seen him bowl yet.

slcricfan1
Posts: 1568
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2021 5:14 am
Location: Sydney

Re: 2022 U19 World Cup Thread

Post by slcricfan1 »

Googly wrote:
Wed Feb 02, 2022 1:34 pm
Top 3 teams have the 3 most successful opening partnerships.
Also the richest boards

Post Reply