[Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Participate in discussion with your fellow Zimbabwe cricket fans!
hhm
Posts: 1816
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:05 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by hhm »

sscricket wrote:NCube is suited for one dayers where someone can support him from the other end or get help from the pitch. He is not a test match bowler. If he is getting only two wickets at domestic level per game he is simply not good enough for tests. Meth is a matchwinner who should get his much deserved chance in tests purely on the basis of what he has done at the domestic level which is winning games single handedly.
Ncube got a couple of wickets but that was only because the batsmen were going after him. It is shocking the selectors cannot see who the
better bowler is. In a test match situation I can see Meth tormenting batsmen for long periods. You cannot see him off like in one dayers....The
attack looks totally one dimensional, no swing no reverse swing no turn. NZ will not lose this game even though their attack is equally worse. Any first
class side from Aus or South Africa will beat NZ
...Chakabwa should be playing club cricket. I dont understand how he has played so many games....
Average bowlers or batsmen will never win you a test match.
Jarvis is overrated. He bowls straight overpitched deliveries. Any batsman worth his salt should punish him.
sscricket I see you say you're an Indian supporter. I take it you're Indian then right? Whatever the case might be, this is exactly what this forum needs, people who based on what they witness before their eyes, can come in and expose the fallacies which certain sections here choose to campaign for against the course of realism. First of all, depending on how much you know of the above mentioned players, I'd like argue and say Jarvis has the makings to go on and be a champion bowler, while Ncube's determination and talent will get him there at some point, and Chakabva for all his deficiencies does look promising - Mutizwa and even our great Brendan Taylor hardly look as solid and composed as he is at the crease sometimes, he may never be as good, but he has the raw ingredients. Age is on their side.

However, I totally agree that Jarvis (and Ncube & Chakabva) should not be playing at Test level, not even for Zimbabwe at any point right now. They neither have the pedigree to show that they are capable wicket takers in the longer format throughout a FC season, neither have they displayed that they have the required skill to trouble batsmen at this level. Indeed, any batsman worth his salt should bludgeon them, and so it shall be for the next few years. I take delight in the fact that you rate Meth despite his lack of pace - a clear sign that you are not fooled by a bowler's lack of pace. Meth has proven himself many a time at FC level, but as far as bowlers and batsmen are concerned our colleagues (and clearly the selectors as well) do not take such things into consideration - they go on what appears convincing to the eye never mind it's authentcity when put under the microscope. We have a few players who are more primed to deliver at this stage, better than both Meth & Mutizwa, but instead many are happy to be blinded by the odd and infrequent spells of good performances, which these unqualified finds of ours come up with against watered down opposition, and simply leave the rest to fate!

Now as for Waller FlowerPower, surely you could have put it better. Try 'stupid and inexperienced' instead of 'unselfish and naive'! That's unforgivable. If he was within grabbing distance of AC, judging form his commentary at that point, I'm pretty sure he would've punched him! Such basics are absorbed at club level let alone FC!

True Elton, Cremer and Meth's batting is overrated. Anything bowlers add on the scoreboard is a bonus. I say it time and again, judging from the standard of our top order itself, it is a travesty to even expect our tail to wag. From the little I've seen, I also think Vitori can land some useful nasty blows. Regarding your summation of his 'namesake' Vettori - spot on!

Junior power, keeping Patel in would've been a masterstroke on our part the more time he spends at the crease with less runs added on the board, the greater a chance we would have had of drawing this one! Our captain certainly didn't see it that way. He probably thinks this is Bangladesh and he can be as bold as that declaration he made.
1Mawoyo 2Vusi 3Hami 4Taylor(c) 5Craig 6Matsi 7Taibu(wk) 8Elton 9Cremer 10Rainsford 11Mpofu 12Jarvis

foreignfield
Posts: 4944
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:39 am
Supports: Mountaineers

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by foreignfield »

That was dead plumb! Unlucky for Ncube, just after finding the edge.

BaijuSpeaks
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:28 am

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by BaijuSpeaks »

BaijuSpeaks wrote: So, the only way out is to delay the scoring rate as much as possible.
Give as many overs as possible to Price. Let him bowl over the stumps :D and put a defensive field.
Support for my post earlier today :D
Ray Price --> 12-4-21-1

Price is doing as excellant job. Trying to make the inevitable NZ declaration as late as possible.

hhm
Posts: 1816
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:05 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by hhm »

BaijuSpeaks wrote:
BaijuSpeaks wrote: So, the only way out is to delay the scoring rate as much as possible.
Give as many overs as possible to Price. Let him bowl over the stumps :D and put a defensive field.
Support for my post earlier today :D
Ray Price --> 12-4-21-1

Price is doing as excellant job. Trying to make the inevitable NZ declaration as late as possible.
I agree, I hope Ross doesn't decide to take him on. He's done it successfully before! Kane the youngster is doing alright. I predict he will go on to great things!
1Mawoyo 2Vusi 3Hami 4Taylor(c) 5Craig 6Matsi 7Taibu(wk) 8Elton 9Cremer 10Rainsford 11Mpofu 12Jarvis

jimbo
Posts: 1450
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:30 pm

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by jimbo »

Out of the fast bowlers bubbling under this side would you say that rainsford/Meth/Shingi masakadza/Chatara would all have done a better job than Ncube and are more deserving of a place. Even shingi expensive as he can be has been taking hatfulls of 5 wicket hauls domestically

anusha gamage
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:09 am

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by anusha gamage »

hi anusha from SL...
nz trying to boost run rate.. i think they will stop inning after tea ,,,they are try to score 375 - 425
very dificult to bat last season ....zim need a bat wotch full good luck :) :) :) :) :)

zimfan1
Posts: 7108
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:45 pm
Supports: MidWest Rhinos
Location: Wales

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by zimfan1 »

Jarvis in the middle of a good spell here, moving the ball into the right hander with a bit of reverse swing which is how he got Williamson out. for me Jarvis is our number 1 fast bowlers in the longer version of the game and we should build our attack around him. remember he is still farily new to FC cricket and he has shown improvement this home season and now bowls with much better control and can swing it both ways (mainly outswing to the right hander)

I think the issue is who do we get the partner him, i worry about Vitoris effectiveness bowling to right handers as he does struggle to bring the ball back into them and Nube for me does not do enough with the ball. meth can do i job but i dont think he is a long term Test Match bowler as i do beleive that Chitara will come into things in the next year or so when he gets more experience. I still feel that Rainsford could be a job in the Test side but as others have pointed out he is injury prone.

Jemisi
Posts: 9393
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:04 am
Supports: Southern Rocks

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by Jemisi »

Conant wrote:While analyzing Malcolm Waller the batsmen who failed to he farm the strike against the tail, we’ve missed the essence of Waller the man. I was the first I think (actually I’m smugly certain :D ) to observe the unselfish nature of Waller, and while evidently he miscalculated by giving the strike to Christopher Mpofu and Njabulo I believe it is genuinely becasue he believed they could handle it. He was guilty of naiveté more than anything. No doubt he will be given proper instructions by management next time and more importantly he would have realized it himself by now.
jimbo wrote:I’m sure meth and Cremer could have got 50 between them, how we miss them in our tail
These two don’t average 40 between them in domestic cricket and last night you wanted them to make 50? Am sorry to say this but together with Chigumbura, Cremer’s batting is quite easily the most overrated on this forum. He may spank the odd ball now and then but better be banking on Shingi Masakadza or Brian Vitori, who as time goes will improve very rapidly.
Jemisi wrote:313, hhhmmm. Well, a disappointment on this wicket, I think. considering where things were at, we should probably have managed another 50.

Still, we managed to bat a long time and had some decent performances. The very long tail is hurting us. I know we are supposed to pick the best 4 bowlers regardless of their batting, but these days the last 4 are expected to contibute, and our guys got 9 between them. The top 7 have done ok, with a little tail end support we would be at 350.
I think Meth needs to be picked for NZ, not Ncube.
Al l this talk about a long tail is quite misguided. You pick the best three or four bowlers you have, and work on their batting. You must remember there are international standards, and there are Zim standards. Tino Mawoyo has cracked it in Zim but he wouldn’t cracking an any other team perhhps even Ireland. Vusi may still struggle to get a berth elsewhere but he’s currently our best. This is not to say we must accept mediocre, but a bowler’s chief jobs is still to strike, the rest is an added bonus.

This is much like complaining about Raymond’s Price’s fielding (must say its unbelievable that they’re fielding him at slip), although we would have all loved it if he were quicker in the field. In the event that two bowlers are neck to neck, only then can we consider other merits such as their batting or fielding. Stuart Broad might be better than the average number eight but the reason why our tailenders are not to standard is not because of lack of ability but because there are many late starters there (to cricket) who lack fundamentals. The batting will come with practice and experience, which our batsmen hadn’t been getting let alone our bowlers.
Flower power wrote:I am in the opinion that New Zealand are not immune to collapse , they have already lost their openers . The score is 140/2 ........ by the end of the morning session 200/5 wont be a bad situation , then by after lunch 250 all out will be reachable .
And Zim is going to march on.......Go boys we chased them in the one dayers they are not invisible .
Zim this morning are 20/1 to win this Test match as opposed to New Zealand 6/10. There’s value there.
Forget about the draw, it simply won’t happen.

There’s no real mystery in Daniel Vettori's bowling, just a little old fashioned persistence, dead accuracy and some variation . A little doggedness and concentration on our part will be a big help. This New Zealand attack is much easier to play than the Pakistan one we faced last month. I expect we could bowl them out and I certainly don’t expect us to fold for 140 in the second innings!!

I think my point, Conant, is that our bowlers are much of a muchness and we should be considering their batting skills. Is Ncube heaps better than Shingi?? No, probably Shingi is the better bowler and certainly a better batsman.

User avatar
Flower power
Posts: 934
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:05 pm
Supports: Mountaineers
Location: Mutare

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by Flower power »

if we can get Taylor out early , then we can have a go on a New Zealand tail as we did in the first innings . and Jarvis does that as I am typing..... more fire boys , we can send the Kiwis to the cleaners.....
:W:
Jarvis does it and hits at his doubters

zimfan1
Posts: 7108
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:45 pm
Supports: MidWest Rhinos
Location: Wales

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe v New Zealand: Test Match

Post by zimfan1 »

Think Jarvis is not a much of a muchness just taken his 4th wicket and has shown very good skills with the old ball today, no one can tell me that he is not worth his place in the side, he is the best pace bowler we have

Post Reply